February 19, 2026
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
February 13, 2026
WASHINGTON, DC–Finnegan is pleased to announce a significant victory for client CentralSquare Technologies, LLC (CentralSquare) at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).
On February 19, 2026, in Inter Partes Review (IPR) proceeding No. IPR2025-00959 by Carbyne, Inc., USPTO Director John A. Squires granted CentralSquare's request for Director Review, vacating the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's (PTAB) prior decision granting institution of the IPR, and denied institution of the IPR in its entirety.
The IPR was initiated by Carbyne to challenge the validity of CentralSquare’s U.S. Patent No. RE50,016, titled "SMS Communication During Emergencies." In his detailed order, Director Squires emphasized Carbyne's failure to adequately explain inconsistent claim construction positions advanced in the IPR petition compared to those asserted in the parallel district court litigation, CentralSquare Technologies, LLC v. Carbyne, Inc., No. 1:24-cv-01497-ADA (W.D. Tex.). Specifically, in the district court, Carbyne argued that certain "module" claim terms should be construed as means-plus-function terms under 35 U.S.C. § 112, rendering them indefinite due to a lack of corresponding structure in the specification. In stark contrast, Carbyne's IPR petition posited that these same terms required no further construction and should be given their plain and ordinary meaning, accepting the patent owner's prior representations during reissue proceedings that the terms refer to computer program modules executed by processors.
Director Squires concluded that such unexplained inconsistencies undermine the USPTO's objectives of providing greater predictability and certainty in the patent system. The Director rejected Carbyne's arguments that its positions were not truly inconsistent and that it had provided sufficient justification, noting that merely adopting the patent owner's prosecution statements in the IPR did not explain the divergence from its district court stance.
Importantly, this ruling is expected to have a substantial impact on the parallel litigation pending in the Western District of Texas. By denying institution in full and highlighting Carbyne’s inconsistent claim construction positions, the Director’s decision strengthens CentralSquare’s position in the district court and places significant pressure on Carbyne’s invalidity theories. The order reinforces the need for consistency across forums and signals that strategic divergence between PTAB and district court positions carries real consequences.
Lionel M. Lavenue, counsel for CentralSquare notes, "The Director's decision not only halts this IPR challenge entirely but also compels Carbyne to rethink its overall strategy in the ongoing district court litigation and beyond. We are proud to have secured this outcome for CentralSquare, allowing the company to continue focusing on delivering mission-critical public safety solutions without unwarranted disruption."
Contacts
Terra Liddell, Chief Marketing Officer
terra.liddell@finnegan.com
Angela Robinson, Director of Branding and Communications
angela.robinson@finnegan.com
About Finnegan
When your most valuable assets are ideas, innovation, and brand—you need the best to protect them. Finnegan, a premier intellectual property law firm, is trusted by global leaders to protect and advance what sets them apart. With 11 offices across the globe, we bring local insight and global reach to every IP challenge. We are located in Atlanta, Boston, London, Munich, Palo Alto, Reston, Seoul, Shanghai, Taipei, Tokyo and Washington, DC. From high-stakes litigation to cutting-edge patent strategy and innovative brand management, we deliver unmatched depth, agility, and results. If it is IP, it is Finnegan. Please visit us at www.finnegan.com or follow us on LinkedIn to see how we’re shaping the future of IP, one breakthrough at a time.
Commentary
Patent Strategy Could Shape Financing, Valuation and Risk in Offshore Energy Projects
June 30, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan’s European Practices and Attorneys Highlighted in 2026 Managing IP Rankings
June 25, 2026
Press Release
BMW Obtains Preliminary Injunction Against Zync; Federal Court Orders Zync to Halt ITC Trade Secret
June 23, 2026
Award/Ranking
Six Finnegan Partners Recognized in the 2026 Lawdragon 500 Leading Global IP Lawyers
June 22, 2026
Commentary
U.S. Judge Rules Forum-Selection Clause Bars Zync from Pursuing ITC Trade Secret Case
June 15, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.