直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Commentary

Three Things to Watch at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board

December 27, 2019

Bloomberg Law

Bloomberg Law interviewed Finnegan partner Trenton Ward for his thoughts on things to watch at the PTAB in 2020. Trenton, who served as a lead administrative patent judge at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), noted one trend he expects to continue is the PTAB’s designation of decisions as precedential. In 2018, no decisions were designated as precedential; in 2019, however, the PTAB issued 19 precedential decisions. Trenton said, “[PTO director Andrei Iancu] views the precedent process as an important one at the PTAB for consistency purposes, and I would expect the agency to keep up the process.”

Trenton also predicts that the U.S. Supreme Court will be interested in reviewing Facebook Inc. v. Windy City Innovations LLC, a case in which the Federal Circuit will decide on whether and how much it will yield to decisions from the Precedential Opinion Panel (POP) for PTAB disputes. The POP is the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s top precedent-setting panel that serves as a review board for exceptionally significant issues that arise in PTAB proceedings. The Windy City decision could have significant implications across courts and their deference to government agencies, so Ward expects “a likelihood of a request for cert regardless of what side the court comes out on.”

Related Practices

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

PTAB Invalidation Proceedings: IPR and PGR

Related Offices

Atlanta, GA

Related News

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Recognized Again Among Germany’s Leading Law Firms

October 9, 2026

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Summary Determination of No Violation in ITC Vehicle Space Guards Investigation for Drop Stop

October 6, 2026

Commentary

Federal Circuit Revives Whistleblower Complaint Over VA's AI Claims-Processing Tool

September 25, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Named an IP Litigation Powerhouse in BTI Litigation Outlook 2027

September 24, 2026

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Precedential Pro Bono Federal Circuit Victory for AI Whistleblower

September 23, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Receives Top Tier Rankings in World Trademark Review’s Inaugural Copyright 1000 2026

September 23, 2026

Commentary

New Thomas Pink Womenswear Lines Strain ‘Pink’ Pact with Victoria’s Secret

September 21, 2026

Commentary

FORUM IP Talks: Dr. Jochen Herr on UPC, FRAND, and Cross-Border Enforcement Topics

September 20, 2026

Commentary

Pepsi's U.S. Trademark Dispute Could Reshape Brand Choices, Lawsuit Strategy, Lawyers Say

September 17, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP