直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Media Mention

PTAB's Petition Limits Are Good News for Patent Owners

September 14, 2017

Law360

In a recent decision, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) outlined specific parameters for how multiple challenges to the same patent will be evaluated, likely limiting the number of challenges that ultimately go through. The decision outlines seven factors expected to be used as a baseline for the board when determining whether to reject follow-on petitions. Law360 contacted Finnegan attorney Jason Stach for his thoughts on the PTAB's guidance. 

He said, "It’s encouraging [for patent owners] in that it is a formal adoption by the PTAB of a mechanism for limiting challenges to a patent owner’s patents. From that standpoint, I think patent owners are pleased with this approach.” However, since the decision is not precedential, it is not binding on other panels of PTAB judges. Stach said, “I think there’s still somewhat a lack of clarity when the board is going to decide in its discretion that it won’t institute, but at least this is one step closer to providing relief to patent owners who are concerned that the system has swung too favorably to the petitioner.”

Tags

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)

Related Practices

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

Related Offices

Atlanta, GA

Related Professionals

Jason E. Stach
Partner
Atlanta, GA
+1 404 653 6428
Email

Related News

Commentary

East Texas Reclaims Its Patent Crown

August 21, 2026

Media Mention

Law360's Legal Lions of the Week: Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.

August 21, 2026

Commentary

Early Test of USPTO's Ex Parte Preorder Filing Leads to Re-Exam Denial

August 21, 2026

Award/Ranking

31 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers 2027

August 20, 2026

Media Mention

VW Wins in Patent Appeal Over Electrically Controlled Glasses

August 19, 2026

Press Release

USPTO Denies Super Lighting Reexamination Request Following PVTECH Pre-Order Submission Under New USPTO Procedure

August 19, 2026

Commentary

Why Global IP Litigants Keep Turning to English Courts

August 19, 2026

Media Mention

Federal Circuit Backs Volkswagen’s $207,500 Fees Against NPE

August 19, 2026

Press Release

Federal Circuit Overrules Precedent En Banc in Finnegan Pro Bono Victory for Federally Employed Veterans

August 18, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP