直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Media Mention

PTAB Axes Hair Loss Treatment Patent In Incyte Challenge

April 9, 2019

Law360

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) granted a victory to Incyte Corp in a final inter partes review (IPR) decision, ruling that a Concert Pharmaceuticals Inc. patent related to a potential hair loss treatment was unpatentable. "Having considered the record before us, we determine that petitioner has shown by a preponderance of the evidence that [the patent's claims] are unpatentable," the board said in its decision. Concert claimed that CTP-543, a drug candidate being evaluated as a treatment for a hair loss condition called alopecia areata, was discovered using the company’s technology to modify ruxolitinib. Jakafi, a medication marketed by Incyte to treat polycythemia vera and certain types of myelofibrosis, contains ruxolitinib as the active ingredient.

Finnegan filed the IPR petition with the PTAB in April 2017 on behalf of Incyte. The board originally decided not to review the patent but reversed its decision, saying it had applied an overly restrictive standard in its first analysis and made a mistake during the so-called lead compound analysis, a framework used to review whether pharmaceutical compounds are invalid as obvious.

In the same decision, the PTAB denied Concert's request to amend parts of the patent."[W]e agree with petitioner that the motion to amend does not set forth how the proposed substitute claims respond to the asserted grounds of unpatentability," the board said.

 

Tags

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)

Related Offices

Atlanta, GA

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

Mark J. Feldstein, Ph.D.
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4092
Email

Related News

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Recognized Again Among Germany’s Leading Law Firms

October 9, 2026

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Summary Determination of No Violation in ITC Vehicle Space Guards Investigation for Drop Stop

October 6, 2026

Press Release

Finnegan Wins 2026 Excellence in Construction Award for Washington, DC Office Renovation

September 25, 2026

Commentary

Catching Up with Hope Shimabuku

September 29, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Named an IP Litigation Powerhouse in BTI Litigation Outlook 2027

September 24, 2026

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Precedential Pro Bono Federal Circuit Victory for AI Whistleblower

September 23, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Receives Top Tier Rankings in World Trademark Review’s Inaugural Copyright 1000 2026

September 23, 2026

Commentary

FORUM IP Talks: Dr. Jochen Herr on UPC, FRAND, and Cross-Border Enforcement Topics

September 20, 2026

Commentary

Jellycat’s ‘Dupe’ Dilemma: Can IP Protect a ‘Cute’ Aesthetic?

September 16, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP