August 30, 2013
Daily Journal
In the midst of an “ongoing discussion among the Obama administration, Congress, judges, and lawyers over how to discourage meritless patent infringement lawsuits,” the U.S. Supreme Court is considering whether to take up two “Federal Circuit cases in which litigants won their respective infringement lawsuits, but failed to garner attorney fees.” Finnegan partner Erik R. Puknys provided commentary, observing that “the Federal Circuit has great deference to decide on attorney fee awards if there is a legal dispute.” He also “stressed that the broader debate about Section 285 should not enter into whether the Supreme Court takes up either case.” “The standard of review doesn’t have any impact on the broader policy implications,” he said.
Press Release
October 6, 2026
Commentary
Federal Circuit Revives Whistleblower Complaint Over VA's AI Claims-Processing Tool
September 25, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Named an IP Litigation Powerhouse in BTI Litigation Outlook 2027
September 24, 2026
Press Release
Finnegan Secures Precedential Pro Bono Federal Circuit Victory for AI Whistleblower
September 23, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Receives Top Tier Rankings in World Trademark Review’s Inaugural Copyright 1000 2026
September 23, 2026
Commentary
New Thomas Pink Womenswear Lines Strain ‘Pink’ Pact with Victoria’s Secret
September 21, 2026
Commentary
Pepsi's U.S. Trademark Dispute Could Reshape Brand Choices, Lawsuit Strategy, Lawyers Say
September 17, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.