直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Media Mention

Patent Amendments Face Better Odds Under New AIA Plan

March 19, 2019

Law360

Last week, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office finalized a pilot program, giving patent owners new options in the amendment process, including the ability to revise proposed substitute claims in response to feedback from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. “I think that this accomplishes or at least takes a step in the right direction with respect to enabling and providing a robust ability to amend claims during an AIA trial,” said Finnegan partner and former PTAB judge, Trenton Ward.

Groups including the Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPO) and American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) voiced concerns about the initial plan, but the USPTO seems to have incorporated the comments and concerns into a fair and predictable result. The director of the USPTO, Andrei Iancu, suggested some patent owners have stopped even trying to amend claims, seeing the effort as “largely futile.” “In order to fully implement the intent of the AIA, we must find a way to make this amendment process feasible and meaningful,” Iancu said.

The pilot program is completely optional, and various deadlines have been spread out, as to the earlier plan. The USPTO plans to reevaluate the pilot program in about a year, and make changes depending on feedback and effectiveness of the program.  There are still doubts among attorneys that motions to amend will ever become widespread in AIA reviews, but overall, they believe it will help patent owners’ chance of success in amending patent cases.




Tags

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

Related Offices

Atlanta, GA

Related News

Commentary

Early Test of USPTO's Ex Parte Preorder Filing Leads to Re-Exam Denial

August 21, 2026

Commentary

East Texas Reclaims Its Patent Crown

August 21, 2026

Media Mention

Law360's Legal Lions of the Week: Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.

August 21, 2026

Award/Ranking

31 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers 2027

August 20, 2026

Press Release

USPTO Denies Super Lighting Reexamination Request Following PVTECH Pre-Order Submission Under New USPTO Procedure

August 19, 2026

Media Mention

VW Wins in Patent Appeal Over Electrically Controlled Glasses

August 19, 2026

Media Mention

Federal Circuit Backs Volkswagen’s $207,500 Fees Against NPE

August 19, 2026

Commentary

Why Global IP Litigants Keep Turning to English Courts

August 19, 2026

Press Release

Federal Circuit Overrules Precedent En Banc in Finnegan Pro Bono Victory for Federally Employed Veterans

August 18, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP