直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Media Mention

MGA Entertainment's Infringement of Laser Board Game Patent Did Not Warrant Trebled Damages

April 29, 2015

IP Law Daily

On April 29, the Federal Circuit ruled that a district court erred in tripling a jury’s damage award against Finnegan client MGA Entertainment. In 2007, Innovention Toys filed suit against MGA Entertainment for infringement of its laser board game patent. Initially, the district court found that the patent was valid and infringed by MGA. MGA appealed and while the Federal Circuit affirmed the infringement ruling, the court vacated and remanded the nonobviousness determination due to the district court excluding key prior-art references and incorrectly determining the level of ordinary skill in the art to be that of a layperson. Following the remand, the jury found that the patent was not obvious and that MGA’s infringement was willful. The jury awarded approximately $1.4 million in lost-profit damages to Innovention and then tripled the damage award because of MGA’s alleged willful infringement. Innovention was also awarded $1.8 million in attorney fees in a separate ruling. On appeal, MGA challenged the willful infringement determination and the Federal Circuit ruled that it was an error for the district court to conclude that MGA’s infringement was willful. The Federal Circuit reversed the district court’s willful infringement ruling and vacated the enhanced damages and attorney fees. 

Tags

damages, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC), willful infringement

Related Practices

Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy

Federal Circuit and Supreme Court Appeals

Related Industries

Consumer Products

Related News

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Earns Top Rankings in 2026 IAM Patent 1000 Guide; Nearly 60 Attorneys Ranked

May 28, 2026

Commentary

Quince Aims to Have ‘Dupe’ Evidence Shape Ugg Shoe Patent Trial

May 26, 2026

Commentary

Justices to Side with Generic Drugmakers in Patent Spat, Attorneys Predict

May 5, 2026

Press Release

Pvtech Secures Stay of New Jersey District Court Litigation Following USPTO Institution of All 10 Ex Parte Reexamination Requests Against Patents Asserted by Jiaxing Super Lighting

April 28, 2026

Commentary

Permanent Injunction Granted to USA Weightlifting Inc., Enjoining Use of Protected Marks

April 24, 2026

Press Release

Pvtech Achieves Perfect Record at USPTO: Institution of All 10 of 10 Ex Parte Reexamination Petitions Against Patents Asserted by Jiaxing Super Lighting

April 24, 2026

Commentary

Grambling, After 30 Years, Separates from Pack to Trademark ‘G’

April 15, 2026

Commentary

Patent Cases Down 64% YOY at PTAB, up 70% at ITC in Q1 2026

April 15, 2026

Media Mention

Federal Circuit Grills Sanctioned Patent Lawyer Over Conduct

April 9, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP