February 10, 2021
Law360
On February 10, 2021, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled in favor of Finnegan client Caterpillar, reviving Caterpillar’s bid to amend a road milling machine patent challenged by Wirtgen at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). The Federal Circuit ruled that the PTAB erred in finding Caterpillar’s proposed substitute claims to be obvious based on a prior patent known as Panoushek. Caterpillar argued that Panoushek’s method did not disclose a recall function using unique identifiers, but the PTAB ruled that Panoushek’s method did not "nullify" the fact that it used the identifiers to recall the parameters. On appeal, the Federal Circuit sided with Caterpillar, stating that the board applied an incorrect claim construction when evaluating the patentability of the proposed substitute claims. The Federal Circuit vacated and remanded the case back to the PTAB.
Read the full article here.
Award/Ranking
June 5, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Earns Top Rankings in 2026 IAM Patent 1000 Guide; Nearly 60 Attorneys Ranked
May 28, 2026
Commentary
May 20, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Partner Antje Brambrink Shortlisted for Women in Business Law EMEA Award
May 13, 2026
Press Release
Finnegan Secures Decisive ITC Victory for Innoscience in Final Determination
May 11, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.