直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Commentary

Albright Grants BMW’s Antisuit Injunction Against Onesta

January 13, 2026

Intellectual Asset Management (IAM)

Judge Alan Albright of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas has granted Finnegan client BMW’s motion for an antisuit injunction, preventing nonpracticing entity Onesta IP from advancing two infringement actions it filed in Germany asserting U.S. patents. The ruling reinforces that disputes involving U.S. patents should be adjudicated in U.S. courts under U.S. law. 

Finnegan partner, Lionel Lavenue, who represents BMW in the U.S. litigation, explained that Judge Albright emphasized the constitutional importance of the American jury system during the January 13 hearing. Because German courts do not provide a jury right, allowing the foreign actions to proceed would undermine that protection. Lionel noted that the judge also stressed that “U.S. patents ought to be litigated in U.S. courts,” and attempts to sidestep that framework “didn’t sit well with him.” 

Lionel stated, “This outcome safeguards American innovation, ensures fair and predictable enforcement of U.S. intellectual property rights and upholds the principle that U.S. patents are adjudicated under U.S. law by U.S. courts.” 

He also highlighted the broader jurisdictional question at the center of the dispute: “The question is, can a foreign court address territorial limitations of a U.S. patent?” Onesta’s German filings were widely viewed as a test of whether the EU’s BSH Hausergate v. Electrolux decision could extend crossborder jurisdiction to U.S. patents, an issue closely watched across the global patent community. 

Read  Albright Grants BMW’s Antisuit Injunction Against Onesta 

Tags

Western District of Texas, non-practicing entity (NPE), BMW v. Onesta

Related Practices

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Patent Litigation and Trials

Related Industries

Transportation and Logistics

Automotive and Smart Mobility Tech

Related Offices

Reston, VA

Related Professionals

Lionel M. Lavenue
Partner
Reston, VA
+1 571 203 2750
Email

Related News

Media Mention

Law360's Legal Lions of the Week: Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.

August 21, 2026

Commentary

Early Test of USPTO's Ex Parte Preorder Filing Leads to Re-Exam Denial

August 21, 2026

Media Mention

Federal Circuit Backs Volkswagen’s $207,500 Fees Against NPE

August 19, 2026

Commentary

Why Global IP Litigants Keep Turning to English Courts

August 19, 2026

Press Release

USPTO Denies Super Lighting Reexamination Request Following PVTECH Pre-Order Submission Under New USPTO Procedure

August 19, 2026

Media Mention

VW Wins in Patent Appeal Over Electrically Controlled Glasses

August 19, 2026

Award/Ranking

Fourteen Finnegan Attorneys Named to the 2026 IAM Strategy 300 List

August 13, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Climbs Two Spots on The American Lawyer’s 2026: A-List Runners Up

August 12, 2026

Commentary

UK Patent Document Access Rules Raise Secrecy Concerns

August 12, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP