直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Commentary

Albright Grants BMW’s Antisuit Injunction Against Onesta

January 13, 2026

Intellectual Asset Management (IAM)

Judge Alan Albright of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas has granted Finnegan client BMW’s motion for an antisuit injunction, preventing nonpracticing entity Onesta IP from advancing two infringement actions it filed in Germany asserting U.S. patents. The ruling reinforces that disputes involving U.S. patents should be adjudicated in U.S. courts under U.S. law. 

Finnegan partner, Lionel Lavenue, who represents BMW in the U.S. litigation, explained that Judge Albright emphasized the constitutional importance of the American jury system during the January 13 hearing. Because German courts do not provide a jury right, allowing the foreign actions to proceed would undermine that protection. Lionel noted that the judge also stressed that “U.S. patents ought to be litigated in U.S. courts,” and attempts to sidestep that framework “didn’t sit well with him.” 

Lionel stated, “This outcome safeguards American innovation, ensures fair and predictable enforcement of U.S. intellectual property rights and upholds the principle that U.S. patents are adjudicated under U.S. law by U.S. courts.” 

He also highlighted the broader jurisdictional question at the center of the dispute: “The question is, can a foreign court address territorial limitations of a U.S. patent?” Onesta’s German filings were widely viewed as a test of whether the EU’s BSH Hausergate v. Electrolux decision could extend crossborder jurisdiction to U.S. patents, an issue closely watched across the global patent community. 

Read  Albright Grants BMW’s Antisuit Injunction Against Onesta 

Tags

Western District of Texas, non-practicing entity (NPE), BMW v. Onesta

Related Practices

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Patent Litigation and Trials

Related Industries

Transportation and Logistics

Automotive and Smart Mobility Tech

Related Offices

Reston, VA

Related Professionals

Lionel M. Lavenue
Partner
Reston, VA
+1 571 203 2750
Email

Related News

Commentary

Levi’s Has Filed 2 New Lawsuits This Year to Protect Its Red Tab Trademark

July 9, 2026

Commentary

‘Oyez, Oyez.’ Supreme Court’s Last Official Crier Dies at 102

July 8, 2026

Commentary

Patent Strategy Could Shape Financing, Valuation and Risk in Offshore Energy Projects

June 30, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan’s European Practices and Attorneys Highlighted in 2026 Managing IP Rankings

June 25, 2026

Commentary

Zync Fights Block of ITC Trade Secret Case Against BMW

June 24, 2026

Press Release

BMW Obtains Preliminary Injunction Against Zync; Federal Court Orders Zync to Halt ITC Trade Secret

June 23, 2026

Commentary

BMW Secures Injunction Forcing Zync to Seek Stay of ITC Trade Secret Case

June 23, 2026

Award/Ranking

Six Finnegan Partners Recognized in the 2026 Lawdragon 500 Leading Global IP Lawyers

June 22, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Recognized in 2026 BTI Client Service A-Team Rankings

June 22, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP