直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Commentary

Albright Grants BMW’s Antisuit Injunction Against Onesta

January 13, 2026

Intellectual Asset Management (IAM)

Judge Alan Albright of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas has granted Finnegan client BMW’s motion for an antisuit injunction, preventing nonpracticing entity Onesta IP from advancing two infringement actions it filed in Germany asserting U.S. patents. The ruling reinforces that disputes involving U.S. patents should be adjudicated in U.S. courts under U.S. law. 

Finnegan partner, Lionel Lavenue, who represents BMW in the U.S. litigation, explained that Judge Albright emphasized the constitutional importance of the American jury system during the January 13 hearing. Because German courts do not provide a jury right, allowing the foreign actions to proceed would undermine that protection. Lionel noted that the judge also stressed that “U.S. patents ought to be litigated in U.S. courts,” and attempts to sidestep that framework “didn’t sit well with him.” 

Lionel stated, “This outcome safeguards American innovation, ensures fair and predictable enforcement of U.S. intellectual property rights and upholds the principle that U.S. patents are adjudicated under U.S. law by U.S. courts.” 

He also highlighted the broader jurisdictional question at the center of the dispute: “The question is, can a foreign court address territorial limitations of a U.S. patent?” Onesta’s German filings were widely viewed as a test of whether the EU’s BSH Hausergate v. Electrolux decision could extend crossborder jurisdiction to U.S. patents, an issue closely watched across the global patent community. 

Read  Albright Grants BMW’s Antisuit Injunction Against Onesta 

Tags

Western District of Texas, non-practicing entity (NPE), BMW v. Onesta

Related Practices

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Patent Litigation and Trials

Related Industries

Transportation and Logistics

Automotive and Smart Mobility Tech

Related Offices

Reston, VA

Related Professionals

Lionel M. Lavenue
Partner
Reston, VA
+1 571 203 2750
Email

Related News

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Recognized Again Among Germany’s Leading Law Firms

October 9, 2026

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Summary Determination of No Violation in ITC Vehicle Space Guards Investigation for Drop Stop

October 6, 2026

Commentary

Catching Up with Hope Shimabuku

September 29, 2026

Commentary

Federal Circuit Revives Whistleblower Complaint Over VA's AI Claims-Processing Tool

September 25, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Receives Top Tier Rankings in World Trademark Review’s Inaugural Copyright 1000 2026

September 23, 2026

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Precedential Pro Bono Federal Circuit Victory for AI Whistleblower

September 23, 2026

Commentary

New Thomas Pink Womenswear Lines Strain ‘Pink’ Pact with Victoria’s Secret

September 21, 2026

Commentary

FORUM IP Talks: Dr. Jochen Herr on UPC, FRAND, and Cross-Border Enforcement Topics

September 20, 2026

Commentary

Pepsi's U.S. Trademark Dispute Could Reshape Brand Choices, Lawsuit Strategy, Lawyers Say

September 17, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP