直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Commentary

5 Questions from Tuesday's Cert Grant on PTO Judge Appointments

October 13, 2020

The National Law Journal

The Supreme Court of the United States granted cert in Arthrex Inc. v. Smith & Nephew Inc., a case in which they will decide whether the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) administrative patent judges should be appointed by the president and confirmed by the U.S. Senate or if they should be appointed by a cabinet chief. The decision could sever patent laws and impact patent cases that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has remanded back to the PTAB. National Law Journal contacted Finnegan partner and former lead administrative patent judge, Trenton Ward, for his perspective on whether the Supreme Court’s decision to hear Arthrex will affect the PTAB’s current day-to-day practice. He said, “Obviously, they’re aware of it, but there’s a lot of work to be done, and you can’t continually focus on issues that are outside the control of the PTAB. This is one of them.”

Read the full story here.

Tags

Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), Arthrex v. Smith & Nephew

Related Practices

Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy

Federal Circuit and Supreme Court Appeals

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

Related Offices

Atlanta, GA

Related News

Commentary

Early Test of USPTO's Ex Parte Preorder Filing Leads to Re-Exam Denial

August 21, 2026

Commentary

East Texas Reclaims Its Patent Crown

August 21, 2026

Media Mention

Law360's Legal Lions of the Week: Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.

August 21, 2026

Award/Ranking

31 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers 2027

August 20, 2026

Press Release

USPTO Denies Super Lighting Reexamination Request Following PVTECH Pre-Order Submission Under New USPTO Procedure

August 19, 2026

Commentary

Why Global IP Litigants Keep Turning to English Courts

August 19, 2026

Media Mention

Federal Circuit Backs Volkswagen’s $207,500 Fees Against NPE

August 19, 2026

Press Release

Federal Circuit Overrules Precedent En Banc in Finnegan Pro Bono Victory for Federally Employed Veterans

August 18, 2026

Commentary

Fed. Circ. Overrules Precedent on Veteran Hiring Protections

August 14, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP