直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

James R. Barney

Pratt & Whitney Claims Rolls-Royce Misled USPTO

September 27, 2010

Law360

United Technologies Corp. unit Pratt & Whitney has mounted a new challenge to a patent held by Rolls-Royce PLC for blades used in jet engines, accusing Rolls-Royce of misleading the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in order to obtain the patent. Pratt & Whitney announced Monday that it had filed a complaint against Rolls-Royce in the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut over the patent. Back in May, Rolls-Royce accused Pratt & Whitney of infringing U.S. Patent Number 6,071,077, titled “Swept fan blade” at the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. Pratt & Whitney argues in the current suit that Rolls-Royce engaged in unfair behavior to mislead the USPTO into issuing the patent-at-issue that the Rolls-Royce patent is invalid, unenforceable. The challenge also states that Rolls-Royce is unlawfully using its patent and taking other actions in an attempt to harm Pratt & Whitney. Finnegan is representing Pratt & Whitney.

Related News

Press Release

BMW Obtains Preliminary Injunction Against Zync; Federal Court Orders Zync to Halt ITC Trade Secret

June 23, 2026

Award/Ranking

Six Finnegan Partners Recognized in the 2026 Lawdragon 500 Leading Global IP Lawyers

June 22, 2026

Commentary

U.S. Judge Rules Forum-Selection Clause Bars Zync from Pursuing ITC Trade Secret Case

June 15, 2026

Commentary

Finnegan Taps Partner from Kirkland to Boost IP Team

June 12, 2026

Award/Ranking

World Trademark Review Recognizes Three Finnegan Partners on its 2026 Global Leaders List

June 24, 2026

Commentary

Will the Chicago Cubs Win Their Game Over 'The Rooftop Phenomenon'?

June 8, 2026

Commentary

New Appellate Opinion in Amazon Biometric Data Case May Signal ‘Narrowing’ Scope of BIPA Litigation, Experts Say

May 20, 2026

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Decisive ITC Victory for Innoscience in Final Determination

May 11, 2026

Commentary

ITC Bars Import of Innoscience Chips Made Before Redesign

May 8, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP