直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

James R. Barney

Pratt & Whitney Claims Rolls-Royce Misled USPTO

September 27, 2010

Law360

United Technologies Corp. unit Pratt & Whitney has mounted a new challenge to a patent held by Rolls-Royce PLC for blades used in jet engines, accusing Rolls-Royce of misleading the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in order to obtain the patent. Pratt & Whitney announced Monday that it had filed a complaint against Rolls-Royce in the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut over the patent. Back in May, Rolls-Royce accused Pratt & Whitney of infringing U.S. Patent Number 6,071,077, titled “Swept fan blade” at the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. Pratt & Whitney argues in the current suit that Rolls-Royce engaged in unfair behavior to mislead the USPTO into issuing the patent-at-issue that the Rolls-Royce patent is invalid, unenforceable. The challenge also states that Rolls-Royce is unlawfully using its patent and taking other actions in an attempt to harm Pratt & Whitney. Finnegan is representing Pratt & Whitney.

Related News

Commentary

Early Test of USPTO's Ex Parte Preorder Filing Leads to Re-Exam Denial

August 21, 2026

Press Release

USPTO Denies Super Lighting Reexamination Request Following PVTECH Pre-Order Submission Under New USPTO Procedure

August 19, 2026

Commentary

Why Global IP Litigants Keep Turning to English Courts

August 19, 2026

Award/Ranking

Fourteen Finnegan Attorneys Named to the 2026 IAM Strategy 300 List

August 13, 2026

Award/Ranking

Partner Jeffrey M. Jacobstein Named Finalist for New England Legal Awards

August 10, 2026

Commentary

GenAI Patent Surge Extends Well Beyond Familiar Platform Firms

August 10, 2026

Commentary

Q&A: What the 'GenAI Boom' Means for Patents

August 6, 2026

Commentary

BMW Counsel: How a Supplier Clause Prevented U.S. Trade Secret Litigation

August 3, 2026

Commentary

BMW Uses Forum-Selection Clause to Shut Down ITC Trade Secret Investigation

July 31, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP