专利诉讼与审判
About
正确的团队对审判关系重大
当您的公司面临知识产权（IP）纠纷时，意味着存在较高的风险。当存在审判的可能性时，风险更大。法官或陪审团将就技术、品牌和营销权或许可权作出关键判决。要分析、审查和陈述的信息量以及所涉及的技术或科学的复杂性需要高度集中、一丝不苟的专注，，还需要具备有说服力地传达立场的能力。
经验
Secured dismissal with prejudice by establishing that plaintiff failed to plead compliance with the patent-marking requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 287. Successfully defended the judgment on appeal, where the Federal Circuit issued a precedential decision affirming the dismissal and attorney-fee award, strengthening precedent on patent marking and appellate jurisdiction.
4:23-cv-02961, S.D. Tex., Judge Rosenthal
24-2226, Fed. Cir., Judges Lourie, Cunningham, Moore
Achieved a comprehensive victory for respondent Innoscience, a global leader in gallium nitride (GaN) power devices, in a high-profile patent dispute before the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). The ITC’s Final Determination confirms that Innoscience avoided all patent claims asserted by Infineon.
337‑TA‑1414, ITC, Judge Moore
Persuaded the court that asserted claims directed to an alleged form of geofencing technology were ineligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101. The court found the patent invalid and dismissed the case against client Audi with prejudice in the first instance.
4:25-cv-11147, E.D. Mich., Judge Behm
Represented a global pharmaceutical company against a generic company on a patent covering an injectable painkilling medicine for short-term pain relief.
Obtained a $240 million jury verdict for client Promptu in a patent infringement lawsuit against Comcast. The jury found that Comcast willfully infringed Promptu’s patents covering voice recognition technology for TV.
2:16-cv-06516, E.D. Pa., Judge Sanchez
22-1939, Fed. Cir., Judges Prost, Moore, Taranto
Advised a global healthcare company in anticipated court proceedings seeking declarations of non-infringement related to its influenza vaccines.