直 Japanese PDF Font
  • 我们的专业人员
  • 服务
  • 我们的见解
  • 办公室
  • 事务所
  • 人才招聘
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • 生命科学
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • 经验

专利诉讼与审判

About

正确的团队对审判关系重大

当您的公司面临知识产权(IP)纠纷时,意味着存在较高的风险。当存在审判的可能性时,风险更大。法官或陪审团将就技术、品牌和营销权或许可权作出关键判决。要分析、审查和陈述的信息量以及所涉及的技术或科学的复杂性需要高度集中、一丝不苟的专注,,还需要具备有说服力地传达立场的能力。

尽管进入审判阶段的知识产权案件不多,但是飞翰律师会从一开始就按照要进行审判的标准进行诉讼。这并不意味着任意搜证和虚增开支,而是整合最好的团队,仔细考虑案情、目标、法院、先例和异议,以及做好公司在每个阶段的定位,以取得最佳成果。飞翰拥有200多名诉讼律师,他们持有几乎各领域的技术学位,且具有法官审判和陪审团审判经验,凭此我所随时准备依靠专业资质在审判和上诉中提起诉讼。

  • 在过去五年中参与超过575起地方法院专利诉讼
  • 在过去五年中参与15%的国际贸易委员会(ITC)案件
  • 在过去五年中提起和抗辩近400起美国商标异议和注销案件
  • 在过去五年中提起和抗辩100多起美国商标民事诉讼
  • 在过去五年中参与500起统一域名争议解决政策(UDRP)仲裁

基于全面理解基础上的强大案件

凭借对知识产权的异常关注,飞翰在审判前和审判期间具有显著优势。与其他类型的诉讼不同,专利案件往往在审判开始之前就已经得到解决。知识产权法的主体事项复杂,法律问题一般十分特殊。权利要求解释、现有技术检索、专利优缺点评估、复审方案、制定损害赔偿策略、确定专家,这些仅仅是可以预先确定专利诉讼结果的一些问题。

当审判是最佳或唯一选择时,飞翰能完美结合技术专长和审判经验。50多年来,我们成功地诉讼了涉及技术上最先进和最复杂的专利、以及全球商标问题的数百起案件。超过75名律师、学生律师和技术专家持有博士学位,覆盖了从神经生物学到电气工程领域,近100名专业人员拥有硕士学位。在审判之前和审判期间,我们运用知识和才智令最复杂的问题变得容易理解,同时削弱对方的论据。我们用准确、易理解和有说服力的方式建立和代理案件。

深入了解每个法庭

我们熟悉知识产权纠纷法庭,因为我们的胜诉足迹几乎遍及所有此类法庭,包括几乎所有的美国地方法院、国际贸易委员会、美国联邦索赔法院、美国联邦巡回上诉法院和美国最高法院。我所律师经常在美国专利商标局、专利审判和上诉委员会、商标审判和上诉委员会以及美国版权局开展工作。我们许多律师也曾在上述法院和机构工作,多名专业人员具有司法法官助理或专利审查员或两者兼有的背景。

Everyone in this practice

经验

In the Matter of Certain Semiconductor Devices and Products Containing the Same

Achieved a comprehensive victory for respondent Innoscience, a global leader in gallium nitride (GaN) power devices, in a high-profile patent dispute before the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). The ITC’s Final Determination confirms that Innoscience avoided all patent claims asserted by Infineon.

337‑TA‑1414, ITC, Judge Moore

WirelessWerx IP, LLC v. Audi of America, Inc.

Persuaded the court that asserted claims directed to an alleged form of geofencing technology were ineligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101. The court found the patent invalid and dismissed the case against client Audi with prejudice in the first instance.

4:25-cv-11147, E.D. Mich., Judge Behm

Promptu Systems Corporation v. Comcast Corporation

Obtained a $240 million jury verdict for client Promptu in a patent infringement lawsuit against Comcast. The jury found that Comcast willfully infringed Promptu’s patents covering voice recognition technology for TV.

2:16-cv-06516, E.D. Pa., Judge Sanchez
22-1939, Fed. Cir., Judges Prost, Moore, Taranto

In Re Certain Polycrystalline Diamond Compacts and Articles Containing Same

Secured a decisive victory for client US Synthetic Corp. (USS) at the ITC. After a full hearing, the ALJ found that respondents infringed multiple claims of USS’s patent and that the claims were valid and supported by a domestic industry, but an initial Commission ruling under § 101 temporarily prevented a finding of violation of Section 337. The Federal Circuit reversed the § 101 ruling, and on remand the ITC found a violation and issued a limited exclusion order barring infringing polycrystalline diamond products from entry into the United States, securing final relief for USS.

337-TA-1236, ITC, Judge Elliot

Carrum Technologies, LLC v. BMW of North America, LLC, et al.

Obtained complete victory against Carrum on appeal of the District of Delaware’s claim construction to the Federal Circuit following Carrum’s stipulation of non-infringement under the claim construction, thereby exonerating BMW’s ACC system, first sold in 2000, against Carrum’s 2004 patents. Invalidated several asserted claims through post-grant efforts before the U.S. Patent Office, including IPRs and EPRs, and pursued claims through proceedings before the Eastern District of Virginia to vindicate BMW’s patent challenges.

1:18-cv-01645, D. Del., Judge Andrews
21-1435, 24-1480, Fed. Cir., Judges Clevenger, Cunningham, Lourie, Moore, Prost, Taranto
IPR2019-00902, -00903, -00904, -00905, -00927, 00928, PTAB, Judges Browne, Scanlon, Tornquist
90/019,010, CRU

Certain Digital Media Devices, Including Televisions, Blu-Ray Disc Players, Home Theater Systems, Tablets and Mobile Phones, Components Thereof and Associated Software

Represented LG Electronics in Investigation concerning certain media technologies in smartphones and televisions, home theater systems, Blu-ray disc players, and tablets. Following trial, all four asserted patents were found not infringed and/or invalid.

337-TA-882, ITC, Judge Shaw

More

专业见解

Conference

7th International Conference on Biofuels and Bioenergy

June 25-26, 2026

Edinburgh

Conference

FCBA Bench & Bar Conference 2026

June 17-20, 2026

Boca Raton

Conference

IPBC Global 2026

June 15-17, 2026

San Diego

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Federal Circuit Affirms Indefiniteness of the Term “About”

June 10, 2026

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Federal Circuit Reinforces Injury-in-Fact Requirement in Appeals from Post-Grant Proceedings

June 10, 2026

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Spotlight on Upcoming Oral Arguments – June 2026

June 8, 2026

More

近期活动

Conference

2026 EDTX Bench Bar Conference

October 28-30, 2026

Fort Worth

Hybrid Conference

Intellectual Property Law Institute 2026 – California

October 19-20, 2026

San Francisco

Hybrid Conference

Intellectual Property Law Institute 2026 – New York

September 28-29, 2026

New York

Conference

2026 IPO Annual Meeting

September 27-29, 2026

Toronto

Conference

Georgia Life Sciences Summit 2026

August 25-26, 2026

Sandy Springs

Conference

7th International Conference on Biofuels and Bioenergy

June 25-26, 2026

Edinburgh

More

新闻

Media Mention

Finnegan Hires Kirkland & Ellis Litigator for London Office

June 8, 2026

Commentary

Finnegan Hires Kirkland Partner as It Eyes UK Growth

June 8, 2026

Press Release

London-Based Life Sciences Litigator Jin Ooi Bolsters Finnegan’s Global IP Litigation Capabilities

June 8, 2026

Award/Ranking

Forbes Names Finnegan Partner Erika Harmon Arner on its Inaugural 2026 America’s Top Women Lawyers List

June 5, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Earns Top Rankings in 2026 IAM Patent 1000 Guide; Nearly 60 Attorneys Ranked

May 28, 2026

Commentary

Quince Aims to Have ‘Dupe’ Evidence Shape Ugg Shoe Patent Trial

May 26, 2026

More

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • 隐私
  • 免责申明
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP