直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Experience

The Ergo Baby Carrier, Inc. v. Mabē, LLC

The Ergo Baby Carrier, Inc.

Mabē, LLC

Finnegan represents Mabē, a small family-owned baby carrier company, defending against patent infringement allegations brought in the International Trade Commission (ITC) by Ergobaby based upon importation and sale of Mabē’s Monarch Baby Carrier. Mabē denies infringement and has asserted affirmative defenses of, inter alia, invalidity and unenforceability.

The Ergo Baby Carrier, Inc. v. Mabē, LLC, 337-TA-1514, ITC, Judge Hines

Related Professionals

Justin J. Hasford
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4175
Email
Mareesa A. Frederick
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4383
Email
Matthew J. Hlinka
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4333
Email
Chiaki Kobayashi
Partner
Tokyo
+ 813 3 431 6525
Email
Michael E. Kudravetz
Litigation Counsel
Boston, MA
+1 617 646 1663
Email
Ngozi D. Akingbesote, Ph.D.
Patent Agent
Reston, VA
+1 571 203 2421
Email

Related Practices

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Patent Litigation and Trials

Related Industries

Consumer Goods and Services

Consumer Products

Related Experiences

Mabē, LLC v. The Ergo Baby Carrier, Inc.

Mabē, LLC

The Ergo Baby Carrier, Inc. v. Mabē, LLC

Mabē, LLC

Certain Vision-Based Driver Assistance System Cameras and Components Thereof

Mobileye, Inc., Magna Electronics, Inc. et al.

Bell Northern Research, LLC v. MediaTek Inc. et al.

MediaTek Inc. et al.

Certain Computing or Graphics Systems, Components Thereof, and Vehicles Containing Same

Toyota Motor Corp.

Certain Road Milling Machines and Components Thereof

Caterpillar, Inc.

Certain Wireless Communications Base Stations

Ericsson Inc.; Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson

Certain Semiconductor Chips and Products Containing Same

Rambus Inc.

Certain Blu-Ray Disc Players

Sony Corp.

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP