直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Commentary

Oura Targets Ultrahuman’s Redesigned Smart Ring Following Import Ban

October 29, 2026

World Intellectual Property Review

Finnish wearable technology company Oura has filed a new patent infringement lawsuit against rival Ultrahuman, alleging that its redesigned Ring Pro continues to infringe Oura’s intellectual property following an earlier U.S. import ban involving Ultrahuman’s Ring Air. The new suit asserts two different patents, including one issued just two days before the complaint was filed, and comes after U.S. Customs cleared the redesigned Ring Pro with respect to the patent at issue in the earlier proceeding.

Finnegan partner Matthew Berntsen told World Intellectual Property Review that in the US, “there's a proud tradition in patent prosecution when it's being done in tandem with litigation of crafting the later claims. Particularly, we see this in ‘continuations of continuations’ where the patent family is kept alive and the claims are crafted on what the company's competitors are doing.”

Given Oura’s sophisticated prosecution and litigation strategy, Matthew believes that this was “very much a coordinated strategy that had been in the works for some time.

“Almost never does one write a complaint for a patent infringement suit in [two] days.”

Related to Oura’s previous settlement and license deals, such as with Circular, RingConn, Omate and Zepp Health, Matthew sees it as likely that Oura is in ongoing licensing discussions with Ultrahuman.

“As much fun as litigation can be, it's rarely an operating company’s goal to be embroiled in litigation endlessly,” he said.

“This is where involving patent attorneys, doing freedom-to-operate studies and understanding what the IP landscape looks like before you enter a new region can be incredibly important.”

When deciding whether to pursue a redesign or design-around, companies weigh several factors, including cost, implementation time, and the potential impact on the product and customer perception.

“If there is a license offer on the table, all of these are competing concerns in the calculus that the companies on both sides are taking into account,” said Matthew.

Read “Oura Targets Ultrahuman’s Redesigned Smart Ring Following Import Ban”

Related Practices

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Patent Litigation and Trials

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

Patent Oppositions and Appeals

Prosecution and Portfolio Management

Patent Drafting and Prosecution

Design Rights

Related Industries

Consumer Goods and Services

Consumer Products

Life Sciences

Medical Device and Diagnostics

Digital Health

Related Offices

Boston, MA

Related Professionals

Matthew C. Berntsen
Partner
Boston, MA
+1 617 646 1618
Email

Related News

Commentary

Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders Sue My Chemical Romance

October 29, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Shortlisted for two ALB Korea Law Awards 2026

October 23, 2026

Commentary

Grey Areas Haunt Victoria’s Secret ‘Pink’ Coexistence Pact

October 23, 2026

Award/Ranking

Six Finnegan Partners Named to IAM 2027 Global Leaders Guide

October 21, 2026

Commentary

Finnegan Betting on Investments in Becoming Global One-Stop IP Shop

October 12, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Recognized Again Among Germany’s Leading Law Firms

October 9, 2026

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Summary Determination of No Violation in ITC Vehicle Space Guards Investigation for Drop Stop

October 6, 2026

Press Release

Finnegan Wins 2026 Excellence in Construction Award for Washington, DC Office Renovation

September 25, 2026

Commentary

Catching Up with Hope Shimabuku

September 29, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP