特許訴訟および裁判
About
包括的戦略のもと構築された公判での揺るぎない陳述
高度な技術や科学に基づく問題が絡む場合、リーガル・チームは紛争の主題だけでなく、知的財産法特有の判例や手続き上のニュアンスも理解できていることが不可欠です。他の訴訟と異なり、特許訴訟は公判前に多いことから、弊所が知財に特化していることは、公判前及び公判中に確かなアドバンテージとなります。他のタイプの訴訟とは異なり、特許訴訟は多くの場合公判が開始される前に解決します。主題は複雑で、争点は多くの場合知財法特有のものです。クレーム解釈、先行技術調査、特許の強み及び弱みの評価、再審査という選択肢、損害賠償戦略の構築、並びに専門家の選定 ― これらは特許訴訟の行方を方向付ける課題の一部にすぎません。
実績
Secured dismissal with prejudice by establishing that plaintiff failed to plead compliance with the patent-marking requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 287. Successfully defended the judgment on appeal, where the Federal Circuit issued a precedential decision affirming the dismissal and attorney-fee award, strengthening precedent on patent marking and appellate jurisdiction.
4:23-cv-02961, S.D. Tex., Judge Rosenthal
24-2226, Fed. Cir., Judges Lourie, Cunningham, Moore
Achieved a comprehensive victory for respondent Innoscience, a global leader in gallium nitride (GaN) power devices, in a high-profile patent dispute before the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). The ITC’s Final Determination confirms that Innoscience avoided all patent claims asserted by Infineon.
337‑TA‑1414, ITC, Judge Moore
Persuaded the court that asserted claims directed to an alleged form of geofencing technology were ineligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101. The court found the patent invalid and dismissed the case against client Audi with prejudice in the first instance.
4:25-cv-11147, E.D. Mich., Judge Behm
Represented a global pharmaceutical company against a generic company on a patent covering an injectable painkilling medicine for short-term pain relief.
Obtained a $240 million jury verdict for client Promptu in a patent infringement lawsuit against Comcast. The jury found that Comcast willfully infringed Promptu’s patents covering voice recognition technology for TV.
2:16-cv-06516, E.D. Pa., Judge Sanchez
22-1939, Fed. Cir., Judges Prost, Moore, Taranto
Advised a global healthcare company in anticipated court proceedings seeking declarations of non-infringement related to its influenza vaccines.
