直 Japanese PDF Font
  • 弁護士等
  • 業務内容
  • 論文等
  • オフィス
  • 事務所概要
  • 採用情報
Finnegan
  • 最新情報
  • Finneganについて
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • プロボノ活動
  • 事務所運営管理
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

James R. Barney

Costs, Litigation Keep AIA Reviews of Design Patents Down

March 16, 2017

Law360

Cases at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) involving design patents are rare. Of the more than 6,4000 petitions filed at the PTAB since 2012, only 41 have challenged a design patent. Despite the increase in the number of design patent applications over the years, and the recent high-profile Apple v. Samsung design patent case at the Supreme Court, many attorneys believe that the cost of AIA reviews has contributed to the lack of proceedings involving design patents. Law360 reached to Finnegan attorney Elizabeth D. Ferrill for her thoughts.

Ferrill said, "If there’s a lawsuit involved, then the cost of the PGR maybe makes some sense. But if there’s no lawsuit, that’s a pretty expensive proposition to take on when you also consider that typically in cases with important, marquee products, the patent owner may still have a patent pending at the patent office." She said that while the number of design patent applications has risen, cases involving design patents have remained steady over the past decade, which may also explain why there haven't been more challenges at the PTAB. "If you view IPRs as typically being tied to litigation, the fact that the [patent application] filings go up doesn’t necessarily mean that the IPRs are going to go up," she said.

Tags

America Invents Act (AIA), Apple, Inc.

Related Practices

意匠権

特許庁における無効審判

PTABにおける無効手続:当事者系レビューおよび特許付与後レビュー

Related Professionals

Elizabeth D. Ferrill
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4445
Email

Related News

Commentary

Patent Strategy Could Shape Financing, Valuation and Risk in Offshore Energy Projects

June 30, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan’s European Practices and Attorneys Highlighted in 2026 Managing IP Rankings

June 25, 2026

Commentary

Zync Fights Block of ITC Trade Secret Case Against BMW

June 24, 2026

Press Release

BMW Obtains Preliminary Injunction Against Zync; Federal Court Orders Zync to Halt ITC Trade Secret

June 23, 2026

Commentary

BMW Secures Injunction Forcing Zync to Seek Stay of ITC Trade Secret Case

June 23, 2026

Award/Ranking

Six Finnegan Partners Recognized in the 2026 Lawdragon 500 Leading Global IP Lawyers

June 22, 2026

Commentary

U.S. Judge Rules Forum-Selection Clause Bars Zync from Pursuing ITC Trade Secret Case

June 15, 2026

Commentary

Finnegan Taps Partner from Kirkland to Boost IP Team

June 12, 2026

Award/Ranking

World Trademark Review Recognizes Three Finnegan Partners on its 2026 Global Leaders List

June 24, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • プライバシー
  • 免責事項
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP