直 Japanese PDF Font
  • 弁護士等
  • 業務内容
  • 論文等
  • オフィス
  • 事務所概要
  • 採用情報
Finnegan
  • 最新情報
  • Finneganについて
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • プロボノ活動
  • 事務所運営管理
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

James R. Barney

Costs, Litigation Keep AIA Reviews of Design Patents Down

March 16, 2017

Law360

Cases at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) involving design patents are rare. Of the more than 6,4000 petitions filed at the PTAB since 2012, only 41 have challenged a design patent. Despite the increase in the number of design patent applications over the years, and the recent high-profile Apple v. Samsung design patent case at the Supreme Court, many attorneys believe that the cost of AIA reviews has contributed to the lack of proceedings involving design patents. Law360 reached to Finnegan attorney Elizabeth D. Ferrill for her thoughts.

Ferrill said, "If there’s a lawsuit involved, then the cost of the PGR maybe makes some sense. But if there’s no lawsuit, that’s a pretty expensive proposition to take on when you also consider that typically in cases with important, marquee products, the patent owner may still have a patent pending at the patent office." She said that while the number of design patent applications has risen, cases involving design patents have remained steady over the past decade, which may also explain why there haven't been more challenges at the PTAB. "If you view IPRs as typically being tied to litigation, the fact that the [patent application] filings go up doesn’t necessarily mean that the IPRs are going to go up," she said.

Tags

America Invents Act (AIA), Apple, Inc.

Related Practices

意匠権

特許庁における無効審判

PTABにおける無効手続:当事者系レビューおよび特許付与後レビュー

Related Professionals

Elizabeth D. Ferrill
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4445
Email

Related News

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Summary Determination of No Violation in ITC Vehicle Space Guards Investigation for Drop Stop

October 6, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Named an IP Litigation Powerhouse in BTI Litigation Outlook 2027

September 24, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Receives Top Tier Rankings in World Trademark Review’s Inaugural Copyright 1000 2026

September 23, 2026

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Precedential Pro Bono Federal Circuit Victory for AI Whistleblower

September 23, 2026

Commentary

New Thomas Pink Womenswear Lines Strain ‘Pink’ Pact with Victoria’s Secret

September 21, 2026

Commentary

Pepsi's U.S. Trademark Dispute Could Reshape Brand Choices, Lawsuit Strategy, Lawyers Say

September 17, 2026

Commentary

Jellycat’s ‘Dupe’ Dilemma: Can IP Protect a ‘Cute’ Aesthetic?

September 16, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Wins “Hatch-Waxman Litigation Firm of the Year – Branded” and David Weingarten Wins “Patent Strategy Attorney of the Year (South)” at the LMG Life Sciences Americas Awards

September 11, 2026

Commentary

Bloomberg Law Q&A with Finnegan IP Lawyer Christian Hurt

September 11, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • プライバシー
  • 免責事項
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP