Experience
Whirlpool Corp. (Voglewede)
LG Electronics, Inc. (Lee)
Represented LG (Lee) in a patent interference provoked by competitor Whirlpool (Voglewede) attempting to challenge LG refrigerator patents; judgment entered against Whirlpool and in favor of client LG.
Whirlpool Corp. (Voglewede) v. LG Electronics, Inc. (Lee), Int. No. 105711, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, Judge Lee
SAP (intervenor)
Lazaridis (Research in Motion)
USPTO v. Alstom Technology Ltd.
Alstom Technology Ltd.
Vas-Cath, Inc. v. University of Missouri
University of Missouri
Ex Parte Mueller-Mach, Reexamination Application No. 90/013,344
Philips Electronics North America Corporation
Reissue proceedings at the USPTO leads to rejection reversal (Ex Parte Belliveau)
High End Systems, Inc.
Chicago Mercantile Exchange, Inc. v. 5th Market Inc.
Chicago Mercantile Exchange, Inc.
Teva Pharmaceuticals International GmbH v. Eli Lilly and Company
Eli Lilly and Company
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.