Experience
SAP (intervenor)
Versata Development Group, Inc.
Represented intervenor SAP in litigation involving an Administrative Procedure Act claim against the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) based on the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's (PTAB's) institution of covered business method (CBM) review.
SAP (intervenor) v. Versata Development Group, Inc., 1:13-cv-00328, E.D. Va., Judges Davis, Lee
Versata Development Group, Inc. v. SAP (intervenor), 14-1145, Fed. Cir., Judges Hughes, Newman, Plager
Finnegan defends architectural work in copyright infringement case for Lessard Design
Lessard Design, Inc.
SAIC
BTG International Ltd.
Netscape
Hyundai Electronics v. Siemens AG
Hyundai Electronics
Certain Point-to-Point Network Communication Devices; Straight Path IP Group v. LG Electronics, Inc.
LG Electronics
Elpida Memory, Inc. v. Infineon Technologies AG
Elpida Memory, Inc.
Audio MPEG v. Creative Labs; Thomson S.A.
Audio MPEG
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.