Experience
Vas-Cath, Inc.
University of Missouri
Represented the University of Missouri in a patent interference related to hemodialysis catheters before the USPTO, two district courts, and the Federal Circuit; judgment of priority was awarded in favor of the client and against Vas-Cath.
Vas-Cath, Inc. v. University of Missouri, Int. No. 103988, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, Judge Martin
Vas-Cath, Inc. v. University of Missouri, 1:03-cv-01952, D.D.C., Judge Stafford
Vas-Cath, Inc. v. University of Missouri, 2:05-cv-00400, W.D. Mo., Judge Fenner
Vas-Cath, Inc. v. University of Missouri, 06-1100, Fed. Cir., Judges Newman, Lourie, Rader
Games Workshop Ltd.
Nissei ASB Co., et al. v. R&D Tool & Engineering Co.
Nissei ASB Co., et al.
FedEx Corp.
Monsanto Co. v. Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc.
Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc.
Brilliant Optical Solutions, LLC v. XO Holdings, Inc.
XO Communications
Novartis Vaccines & Diagnostics, Inc. v. Institut Pasteur
Institut Pasteur
Heroes, Inc. v. Boomer Esiason Heroes Foundation
Heroes Inc.
Zimmer, Inc.
Zymogenetics, Inc. v. Immunex Corp.
Immunex Corp.
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.