Experience

USPTO v. Alstom Technology Ltd.

USPTO

Alstom Technology Ltd.

Successfully defended Alstom Technology Ltd. in ex parte reexamination of its patent directed to activated carbon injection for control of mercury in flue gas.

USPTO v. Alstom Technology Ltd., Control No. 90/012,925, USPTO, Judge Johnson

Related Professionals

Timothy J. May
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4447
Email
Charles T. Collins-Chase
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4108
Email

Related Practices

Ex Parte Reexamination (EPR)

Related Industries

Energy

Clean Energy and Renewables

Related Experiences

Synergy Drone v. SZ DJI Technology Co., Ltd. et al.

SZ DJI Technology Co., Ltd.

Helping a pioneer company navigate cases through the USPTO

Eggleston v. Lazaridis

Lazaridis (Research in Motion)

Chicago Mercantile Exchange, Inc. v. 5th Market Inc.

Chicago Mercantile Exchange, Inc.

PrimeSense, Ltd. v. Primesensor Technology, Inc.

PrimeSense, Ltd.

USPTO cancels all claims for Finnegan client CRS in second CBM proceeding (in favor of)

CRS Advanced Technologies

Ex Parte Mueller-Mach, Reexamination Application No. 90/013,344

Philips Electronics North America Corporation

USB Technologies, LLC v. ADATA Technology USA Co., Ltd.

ADATA Technology USA Co., Ltd.

Guardian Media Technologies Ltd. v. TTE Technology Inc. 

TTE Technology Inc.

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.