Experience
United States Automobile Association v. Truist Bank
United States Automobile Association
Truist Bank, N.A.
Represented Truist Bank in a patent litigation in the Eastern District of Texas against USAA, who asserted five patents directed to mobile deposit technologies. After asserting counterclaims on six patents and filing IPR petitions for each of USAA’s asserted patents, Finnegan’s strategy led to a favorable dismissal.
United States Automobile Association v. Truist Bank, N.A., 2:22-cv-00291, E.D. Tex., Judge Gilstrap
Truist Bank v. United States Automobile Association, IPR2022-01593, IPR2023-00143, -00144, -00183, -00184, -00829, PTAB, Judges Dirba, Droesch, McMillin, White, Zecher
Related Professionals
- Kai Rajan
- Of Counsel
- Washington, DC
- +1 202 408 4307
- Umber Aggarwal
- Associate
- Reston, VA
- +1 571 203 2423
- Amy L. Fulton
- Associate
- Washington, DC
- +1 202 408 4438
- Joseph M. Myles
- Associate
- Washington, DC
- +1 202 408 4372
- Daniel M. Jordan
- Associate
- Reston, VA
- +1 571 203 2471
- Deanna C. Smiley
- Associate
- Reston, VA
- +1 571 203 2717