Associate
Christina's practice spans all phases of litigation, including pre-litigation due diligence, fact discovery, claim construction, expert discovery, and trial. Her experience includes arguing claim construction as well as conducting depositions and cross-examinations of fact and expert witnesses. Christina manages day-to-day aspects of litigation, such as drafting complaints and answers; resolving discovery disputes; collecting and producing documents; drafting discovery responses; and drafting briefs. She also conducts pre-litigation due diligence on the issues of infringement and validity.
Christina is an associate editor of Finnegan's Federal Circuit IP blog. She manages the drafting and publication of summaries of recent precedential opinions by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on intellectual property law issues. She is currently vice chair of the New Lawyers Committee at the American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA).
While in law school, Christina served as a judicial extern for the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, assisting in drafting opinions and memoranda for six patent pilot judges on a variety of patent law issues. Prior to law school, Christina worked as a patent translator at Y.P. Lee, Mock & Partners in South Korea, where she translated numerous patents and assisted in the patent prosecution process across different technologies.
United States Automobile Association v. Truist Bank
2:22-cv-00291, E.D. Tex., Judge Gilstrap
IPR2022-01593, IPR2023-00143, -00144, -00183, -00184, -00829, PTAB, Judges Dirba, Droesch, McMillin, White, Zecher
3:20-cv-00603, D. Nev., Judge Du
IPR2021-00951, -00952, -00953, PTAB
In Re Certain Polycrystalline Diamond Compacts and Articles Containing Same
337-TA-1236 , ITC, Judge Elliot
337-TA-1197, ITC, Judge Shaw
Certain Radio Frequency Micro-Needle Dermatological Treatment Devices and Components Thereof
Represented Syneron-Candela and MGH in patent infringement litigation concerning RF micro-needling technology.
337-TA-1112, ITC, Judge Lord
Valeant Pharmaceuticals NA, LLC v. Zydus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
3:17-cv-00449, D.N.J., Judges Sheridan, Goodman
Federal Circuit IP Blog
PTAB’s Implicit Claim Construction in Obviousness Analysis Constitutes Claim Construction, Even When Its Decision States It Did Not Construe Claims PTAB’s Implicit Claim Construction in Obviousness Analysis Constitutes Claim Construction, Even When Its Decision States It Did Not Construe Claims
March 21, 2024
Federal Circuit IP Blog
Prior Printed Publications “Publicly Available” Despite Confidentiality Restrictions Prior Printed Publications “Publicly Available” Despite Confidentiality Restrictions
March 7, 2024
Federal Circuit IP Blog
“A” or “An” Means “One or More” Unless Indicated Otherwise “A” or “An” Means “One or More” Unless Indicated Otherwise
October 31, 2023
Federal Circuit IP Blog
Fraud Committed in Seeking Incontestability Status Is Not a Basis for Cancelling Trademark Registration Fraud Committed in Seeking Incontestability Status Is Not a Basis for Cancelling Trademark Registration
October 27, 2023
Federal Circuit IP Blog
Federal Circuit Rejects PTAB’s Analysis of Secondary Considerations of Nonobviousness Federal Circuit Rejects PTAB’s Analysis of Secondary Considerations of Nonobviousness
September 6, 2023
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.