直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Experience

The world’s largest manufacturer of off-highway wheels turned to Finnegan to reverse a preliminary injunction

Vehicular Technologies Corporation

Titan Wheel

Titan Wheel faced a preliminary injunction that had far-reaching and negative implications to its core business. Patent owner Vehicular Technologies Corporation prevailed at the district court and sought to prohibit Titan from selling its EZ locker automatic locking differentials for automotive vehicles, as well as a recall of all differentials in its distributors’ possession. Finnegan obtained an emergency stay of the injunction while the appeal was pending at the Federal Circuit and then, on the merits, successfully argued that the district court improperly granted the preliminary injunction based on an incorrect infringement analysis under the doctrine of equivalents. In a 2-1 decision, the Federal Circuit concluded that the accused EZ locker differentials were not likely to infringe the patent claims under a correct understanding of the functions described in the patent-in-suit.

Vehicular Technologies Corporation v. Titan Wheel, 8:96-cv-00216, C.D. Cal., Judges Edwards, Stotler

Vehicular Technologies Corporation v. Titan Wheel, 99-1042, Fed. Cir., Judges Plager, Clevenger, Rader

Related Practices

Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy

Federal Circuit and Supreme Court Appeals

Related Industries

Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials

Manufacturing

Transportation and Logistics

Automotive and Smart Mobility Tech

Related Experiences

United Catalysts turns to Finnegan to reverse an unfavorable judgment and $80 million in damages

United Catalysts

Experience_Preliminary_injunction_motion_denied_in_favor_of_Finnegan_client_Under_Armour

Preliminary injunction motion denied in favor of Finnegan client Under Armour

Under Armour Inc.

Propel Orthodontics successfully beats preliminary injunction motion

Propel Orthodontics, LLC

Comprehensive patent transactions and strategic counseling for one of the largest pharmaceutical companies in the world

Federal Circuit reverses ITC finding in favor of Finnegan client John Mezzalingua Associates

John Mezzalingua Associates, Inc.

Federal Circuit reverses district court ruling of invalidity and upholds rulings on other grounds in favor of Finnegan client Eli Lilly and Co.

Eli Lilly and Company

When the patent for Zyprexa® and $2 billion in annual revenue were on the line, Eli Lilly turned to Finnegan

Eli Lilly and Company

Finnegan client FedEx defeats Ronald Katz’s 11 year licensing litigation

FedEx Corp.

Defeating a motion for preliminary injunction in the Western District of Texas

Cosentino SA et al

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP