直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Experience

When the patent for Zyprexa® and $2 billion in annual revenue were on the line, Eli Lilly turned to Finnegan

Eli Lilly and Company

Zenith Goldline Pharmaceuticals

This ANDA case involved Zenith and two other generic drug manufacturers that attempted to invalidate Lilly's patent and thereby open the market for generic sales. The lengthy trial involved complex technical and legal issues. Lilly prevailed in the district court on all issues, protecting its exclusive marketing rights and a large revenue stream. The Federal Circuit later affirmed the lower court's decision, which upheld Lilly's patent on its blockbuster drug.

Eli Lilly and Company v. Zenith Goldline Pharmaceuticals, 1:01-cv-00443, S.D. Ind., Judges LaRue, Lynch, Shields, Young

Eli Lilly and Company v. Zenith Goldline Pharmaceuticals, 05-1429, -1430, Fed. Cir., Judges Rader, Schall, Gajarsa

Related Professionals

Laura P. Masurovsky
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4043
Email
Ningling Wang
Partner
Shanghai
+86 21 6194 2005
Email
Ryan P. O'Quinn, Ph.D.
Partner
Reston, VA
+1 571 203 2426
Email

Related Practices

Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy

Federal Circuit and Supreme Court Appeals

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Pretrial Strategies

Patent Litigation and Trials

Branded Hatch-Waxman (ANDA) Litigation and Trials

Related Industries

Life Sciences

Pharmaceutical

Biotechnology

Related Experiences

The Hillman Group, Inc. v. KeyMe, LLC

The Hillman Group, Inc.

Bright Data Ltd. v. NetNut Ltd.

NetNut Ltd.

Pinkerton Tobacco Co., LP et al. v. Kretek International, Inc., et al.

Swedish Match North America LLC et al.

Hawk Technology Systems, LLC v. Castle Retail, LLC

Castle Retail, LLC

Japan Display Inc. f/k/a Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc. et al v. Tianma Microelectronics Co.

Tianma Microelectronics Co., Ltd.

Regenxbio, Inc. et al. v. Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. et al.

Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. et al.

Salient Systems Corporation v. Hawk Technology Systems LLC et al.

Salient Systems Corporation

Koninklijke Philips NV and IP2IPO Innovations, Ltd. v. Boston Scientific Corp.

Koninklijke Philips NV and IP2IPO Innovations, Ltd.

American Regent, Inc. v. Pharmacosmos Therapeutics Inc. et al.

American Regent, Inc.

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP