直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Experience

Preliminary injunction motion denied in favor of Finnegan client Under Armour

Healthbox Global Partners LLC

Under Armour Inc.

Two months after Finnegan client Under Armour launched its new connected fitness product under the HEALTHBOX/UA HEALTHBOX mark and name, Healthbox Global Partners, LLC (HGP), a consulting firm for healthcare organizations and startups operating under the HEALTHBOX mark and name, filed claims against Under Armour for trademark infringement, unfair competition, Delaware dilution, and Delaware deceptive trade practices. HGP also filed a motion for preliminary injunction, asking the court to immediately order Under Armour to stop using HEALTHBOX/UA HEALTHBOX and to recall all products from store shelves. Under Armour submitted rebuttal arguments and factual declarations, as well as expert testimony on Under Armour’s damages if forced to rebrand. After oral argument, the court ruled in favor of Under Armour on all key points. HGP dropped the suit against Under Armour shortly thereafter.

Healthbox Global Partners LLC v. Under Armour Inc., 1:16-cv-00146, D. Del., Judge Robinson

Related Professionals

Douglas A. Rettew
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4161
Email

Related Practices

Trademark and Brand Management

Trademark Litigation and Trials

Related Industries

Communications

Internet of Things (IoT)

Consumer Goods and Services

Consumer Products

Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure

Sports, Fitness, and Outdoor Recreation

Life Sciences

Digital Health

Related Experiences

Finnegan secures strategic damages award for Under Armour in trademark infringement litigation

Under Armour

Experience_Finnegan_confirms_significant_international_arbitration_awards_and_injunctive_relief_for_client_Milestone

Finnegan confirms significant international arbitration awards and injunctive relief for client Milestone Systems A/S

Milestone Systems A/S

Under Armour defends its ARMOUR trademark against snowboard apparel infringement

Under Armour

Summary judgment of patent invalidity granted in favor of Finnegan client SinterFire Corporation

SinterFire Corp.

Propel Orthodontics successfully beats preliminary injunction motion

Propel Orthodontics, LLC

Obtaining urgent relief for Under Armour against trademark infringement in China

Under Armour

Examiner's rejection reversed in favor of Finnegan client BrainScope

BrainScope

The world’s largest manufacturer of off-highway wheels turned to Finnegan to reverse a preliminary injunction

Titan Wheel

District court rules in favor of Finnegan client AbbVie

AbbVie Inc.

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP