Partner
Sonja Sahlsten focuses on patent and trade secret litigation in U.S. district courts and appeals to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, where she served as a law clerk. She has a technical background in mechanical engineering, with experience across an array of technologies including those related to medical devices, industrial manufacturing, amusement parks, sports, fitness, and outdoor recreation, and biotechnology. Sonja is board certified in intellectual property by The Florida Bar.
Sonja is experienced in all phases of patent litigation in district courts, from complaint to trial and post-trial. Her experience includes formulating infringement, validity, and claim construction positions; managing discovery and arguing discovery motions; taking and defending fact and expert depositions; preparing witnesses for deposition and trial; examining and cross-examining fact and expert witnesses at trial; and drafting claim construction, summary judgment, and pre- and post-trial motions and briefs. Sonja has also successfully represented parties in post-grant proceedings such as inter partes review (IPR) and ex parte reexamination. Her experience with trade secrets includes both litigation and counseling.
Sonja’s patent prosecution work involves drafting and prosecuting U.S. utility and design patent applications. She has experience with design patents related to consumer products, medical device, and graphical user interfaces (GUIs) and icons. She has prosecuted families of design patents before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and helped direct prosecution in foreign countries.
Sonja is passionate about diversity in IP and working with pro bono clients. As one of the partners-in-charge of pro bono at Finnegan, she focuses her pro bono work on post-conviction relief. Clients she has represented include a former inmate who received a reduction of his 35-year-to-life sentence under the Incarceration Reduction Amendment Act (IRAA) and was released, and another whose 40-year-to life sentence was reduced to time served under the Second Look Amendment Act (SLAA) and was released. Sonja is listed on the Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll. She serves as the co-Chair of the Washington, DC, chapter of Women in IP Network (WIN) and is involved in Finnegan FORWARD (Focused on Raising Women’s Advancement, Representation, and Development), the firm’s women’s business initiative.
While in law school, Sonja served as a legal intern to the Honorable Anne C. Conway at the U.S. District Court for the M.D. Florida. She also worked for the University of Florida Office of Technology Licensing, where she performed patent due diligence in a wide range of technologies, including mechanical, structural, and agricultural innovations.
Before law school, Sonja conducted research on the design and optimization of a novel polygeneration system implemented in communities affected by natural disasters. She also conducted research and testing in green building and home automation technology.
337-TA-1088, ITC, Judge Lord
337-TA-1067, ITC, Judge Shaw
21-1082, -1363, Fed. Cir.
337-TA-985, ITC, Judge Essex
3:15-cv-01890, D. Conn., Judge Covello
Defended patent owner Advanced Drainage Systems before Patent Trial and Appeal Board, which denied institution of inter partes review of two Advanced Drainage Systems’ patents on stormwater chambers. The PTAB designated one of the decisions as informative on 35 U.S.C. § 325(d), regarding arguments challenging a patent that the USPTO has previously considered.
IPR2017-00777, -00526, PTAB, Judges Cocks, Gerstenblith, Grossman
Defended nine requests for ex parte reexamination filed by Zoll Medical and Zoll Lifecor at the USPTO on five Koninklijke Philips patents involving defibrillator waveform technology; patentability of challenged claims confirmed or pending.
Reexamination Nos. 90/013483, 90/013753; 90/013454, 90/013603; 90/013465; 90/013684, 90/013723; 90/013596, 90/013765, USPTO, Judges Dawson, Flanagan, Jastrzab,
Represented patent owner Philips in litigation involving pioneering automated external defibrillator technology; jury found that Zoll Medical infringed multiple patents, leading to eight-figure settlement.
1:10-cv-11041, D. Mass., Judges Gorton, Kelley, Sorokin
14-1791, Fed. Cir., Judges Dyk, Hughes, Lourie
Defended Respironics against infringement claim by Zoll Medical involving collection and transmission of data from wearable medical device; stipulated judgment of no infringement entered after favorable claim construction.
1:12-cv-01778, D. Del., Judge Stark
ProSlide Technology, Inc. v. WhiteWater West Industries, Ltd.
6:20-cv-02189, M.D. Fla., Judge Mendoza
Maglula, Ltd. v. Amazon.Com, Inc. et al
Represented Maglula Ltd. in a district court litigation alleging that Amazon committed patent, trademark, and copyright infringement through its sale of counterfeit consumer products. After Maglula won all claim construction disputes, and after the Court denied Amazon’s summary judgment motion and found that “Amazon’s attempts to avoid liability” would “have minimal impact before a jury,” the parties entered into an agreement and the case was dismissed.
1:19-cv-01570, E.D. Va., Judge O'Grady
Finnegan represented Emergy, Inc., d/b/a Meati Foods in a trade secret misappropriation, breach of contract, and correction of inventorship case against The Better Meat Company (BMC) and Augustus Pattillo involving alternative meat made from mycelium.
Emergy alleged that Augustus Pattillo stole its trade secrets on the cultivation and production of mycelium that he learned while working as a lab technician for Emergy’s founders, misused them in his work with BMC, breached his nondisclosure agreement with Emergy, and improperly filed patent applications on Emergy’s technology and assigned them to BMC.
BMC filed claims of tortious interference and unfair competition against Emergy, which Emergy succeeded in striking under California’s anti-Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPP) statute. After prevailing under the anti-SLAPP statute, Emergy was statutorily entitled to recover its reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs for defending against BMC’s stricken claims of tortious interference and unfair competition
Early in the litigation, Emergy defeated BMC’s motion to dismiss Emergy’s trade secret misappropriation and breach of implied contract claims. Emergy later defeated BMC’s motion for summary judgment on Emergy’s trade secret misappropriation, breach of contract, and breach of implied contract claims. The case settled soon after the Court issued its summary judgment ruling.
2-21-cv-02338, E.D. Cal., Judge Mueller
2-21-cv-02417, E.D. Cal., Judge Mueller
Aerin Medical Inc. et al. v. Neurent Medical Inc. et al.
1:23-cv-00756, D. Del., Judge Hall
IPR2024-00275, -00276, -00277, -00278, -00279, -00280, -00282, -00669, PTAB
iFlight Technology Company, Ltd. et al. v. ITC
21-1082, -1363, Fed. Cir.
Certain Road Construction Machines and Components Thereof
337-TA-1088, ITC, Judge Lord
Federal Circuit IP Blog
Federal Circuit Affirms Noninfringement Ruling in Hatch-Waxman Litigation Based on Claim Construction, Prosecution History Estoppel, and the Disclosure-Dedication Rule Federal Circuit Affirms Noninfringement Ruling in Hatch-Waxman Litigation Based on Claim Construction, Prosecution History Estoppel, and the Disclosure-Dedication Rule
June 26, 2026
Federal Circuit IP Blog
Mere Invalidity of Asserted Claims Does Not Render Patent Infringement Case Exceptional or Warrant Sanctions Mere Invalidity of Asserted Claims Does Not Render Patent Infringement Case Exceptional or Warrant Sanctions
June 26, 2026
Federal Circuit IP Blog
Redesigns Done Right at the ITC: Federal Circuit Affirms ITC Determination of Noninfringement of Redesigned Products Redesigns Done Right at the ITC: Federal Circuit Affirms ITC Determination of Noninfringement of Redesigned Products
June 26, 2026
Federal Circuit IP Blog
Federal Circuit Affirms Indefiniteness of the Term “About” Federal Circuit Affirms Indefiniteness of the Term “About”
June 10, 2026
Award/Ranking
61 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized on the 2025 Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll 61 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized on the 2025 Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll
May 7, 2026
Announcement
Finnegan Announces 2025 Mentors of the Year Finnegan Announces 2025 Mentors of the Year
December 19, 2025
Award/Ranking
Best Lawyers Recognizes 44 Finnegan Attorneys in its 2026 Edition of The Best Lawyers and Ones to Watch Best Lawyers Recognizes 44 Finnegan Attorneys in its 2026 Edition of The Best Lawyers and Ones to Watch
August 21, 2025
Best LawyersPress Release
Pro Bono: Finnegan Obtains Dismissal of Homicide and Related Charges Against DC Man Pro Bono: Finnegan Obtains Dismissal of Homicide and Related Charges Against DC Man
June 13, 2025
Commentary
Newly-Minted Women IP Litigation Partners Embrace Trial Work as a Team Endeavor Newly-Minted Women IP Litigation Partners Embrace Trial Work as a Team Endeavor
June 3, 2005
The AmLaw Litigation DailyAward/Ranking
56 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized on the 2024 Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll 56 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized on the 2024 Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll
April 24, 2025
DC BarDue to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.