Associate
Anthony Berlenbach focuses on all phases and forums of patent and trade secret litigation as well as licensing and client counseling. He represents clients before U.S. district courts, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and arbitration panels.
Anthony works with various technologies, including mechanical and electrical systems, amusement rides, automotive systems, medical devices, gaming and computing technology, consumer goods, welding systems, and pharmaceuticals. He has a technical background in mechanical and biomedical engineering.
Over the years in handling patent litigation, Anthony has taken cases from inception through jury trials and beyond, securing favorable results for clients. He has experience in all aspects of trial preparation, including developing infringement and validity analyses; drafting pleadings and discovery motions; taking complex discovery; working with technical and economic experts; drafting claim construction, Daubert, and summary judgment motions; preparing motions in limine and pre- and post-trial briefs; and conducting examinations at trial.
At the USPTO, Anthony asserts and defends against patentability challenges before the PTAB, representing both petitioners and patent owners. He helps clients navigate patent rights by providing strategic advice through freedom-to-operate (FTO) analyses, opinions addressing patent validity and infringement, and other intellectual property (IP) issues.
Before law school, Anthony worked for a university technology transfer office, managing a portfolio of technologies in various fields, including mechanical and electrical arts, consumer goods, materials, nanotechnology, medical and veterinary devices, clean and renewable energy, and software. Anthony routinely worked with inventors to develop and license technologies. He conducted patentability evaluations, prepared provisional patent applications, and reviewed license agreements and term sheets.
Anthony has been recognized on the Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll.
Jumio Corporation v. FaceTec, Inc.
Representing FaceTec, Inc. in four inter partes reviews (IPRs) relating to groundbreaking 3D liveness detection technology.
IPR2025-00106, -00107, -00108, -00109, PTAB, Judges Khan, Hoang, Baer
Aerin Medical Inc. et al. v. Neurent Medical Inc. et al.
1:23-cv-00756, D. Del., Judge Hall
IPR2024-00275, -00276, -00277, -00278, -00279, -00280, -00282, -00669, PTAB
Transcend Shipping Systems, LLC v. FedEx Corp.
2:22-cv-00110, E.D. Tex., Judges Gilstrap, Payne
Pavemetrics Systems., Inc. v. Tetra Tech, Inc.
2:21-cv-01289-MCS-MAA, C.D. Cal., Judge Scarsi
Cambria Company LLC v. Cosentino SA
6:20-cv-00894, -00895, -00896, -00897, W.D. Tex., Judge Albright
6:20-cv-01080, W.D. Tex., Judge Albright
IPR2021-00214, -00215, -00216; PGR2021-00010, -00090, PTAB, Judges Kalan, Ross, Kaiser
ProSlide Technology, Inc. v. WhiteWater West Industries, Ltd.
6:20-cv-02189, M.D. Fla., Judge Mendoza
Articles
Assignment of “Continuations” Found Not to Include “Continuations-In-Part” Assignment of “Continuations” Found Not to Include “Continuations-In-Part”
March 5, 2026
LES InsightsArticles
SEP Licensing In Europe: Recent Developments SEP Licensing In Europe: Recent Developments
March 5, 2026
LES InsightsArticles
Shall We Strive for More Clarity and Remove Shall from Our Contracts? Shall We Strive for More Clarity and Remove Shall from Our Contracts?
December 29, 2024
LES InsightsArticles
A Promise Not to Challenge the Validity or Enforceability of a Patent in a Settlement Agreement May Be Unenforceable When the Parties Are Not Settling Actual Litigation A Promise Not to Challenge the Validity or Enforceability of a Patent in a Settlement Agreement May Be Unenforceable When the Parties Are Not Settling Actual Litigation
June 6, 2022
LES InsightsArticles
Evidence of Negotiations May Be Admissible When the Evidence Is Not Inconsistent with the Executed Agreement and Is Offered to Rebut Trial Testimony Evidence of Negotiations May Be Admissible When the Evidence Is Not Inconsistent with the Executed Agreement and Is Offered to Rebut Trial Testimony
April 12, 2022
LES InsightsArticles
LESI Global Licensing Report LESI Global Licensing Report
Winter 2022
Licensing Executives Society InternationalAward/Ranking
61 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized on the 2025 Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll 61 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized on the 2025 Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll
May 7, 2026
Award/Ranking
56 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized on the 2024 Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll 56 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized on the 2024 Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll
April 24, 2025
DC BarAward/Ranking
60 Finnegan Attorneys Named to 2023 Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll 60 Finnegan Attorneys Named to 2023 Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll
May 15, 2024
Press Release
Finnegan Secures Jury Verdict for ProSlide Ahead of IAAPA Expo Finnegan Secures Jury Verdict for ProSlide Ahead of IAAPA Expo
November 10, 2023
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.