直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Experience

Koninklijke Philips Electronics, N.V. v. Cardiac Science Operating Co.

Cardiac Science Operating Co.

Koninklijke Philips Electronics, N.V.

In an appeal from an interference action filed under 35 U.S.C. § 146, obtained complete reversal of summary judgment against Philips; on remand, district court ruled for Philips after bench trial.

Cardiac Science Operating Co. v. Koninklijke Philips Electronics, N.V., 2:08-cv-00543, W.D. Wash., Judge Pechman

Koninklijke Philips Electronics, N.V. v. Cardiac Science Operating Co., 09-1241, -1040, Fed. Cir., Judges Friedman, Gajarsa, Michel

Related Professionals

J. Michael Jakes
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4045
Email

Related Practices

Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy

Federal Circuit and Supreme Court Appeals

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Patent Litigation and Trials

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

Interferences

Related Industries

Life Sciences

Medical Device and Diagnostics

Related Experiences

Interference decision reversed in favor of Phillips’s defibrillator patent

Koninklijke Philips Electronics

Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. v. PixelRange, Inc.

Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.

Technical Consumer Products, Inc. v. Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. 

Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.

Haier America Trading, L.L.C. v. Koninklijke Philips N.V. et al.

Koninklijke Philips N.V. et al.

Koninklijke Philips NV f/k/a Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV v. Ideavillage Products Corp.

Koninklijke Philips NV f/k/a Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV

Gardner v. Toyota Motor Corp.

Toyota Motor Corp.

Interval Licensing LLC v. AOL, Inc.

AOL, Inc.

Smart Solutions Technologies, S.L. v. Koninklijke Philips N.V.

Koninklijke Philips N.V.

District court enters judgment of noninfringement for Finnegan client Philips

Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP