Experience
Cardiac Science Operating Co.
Koninklijke Philips Electronics, N.V.
In an appeal from an interference action filed under 35 U.S.C. § 146, obtained complete reversal of summary judgment against Philips; on remand, district court ruled for Philips after bench trial.
Cardiac Science Operating Co. v. Koninklijke Philips Electronics, N.V., 2:08-cv-00543, W.D. Wash., Judge Pechman
Koninklijke Philips Electronics, N.V. v. Cardiac Science Operating Co., 09-1241, -1040, Fed. Cir., Judges Friedman, Gajarsa, Michel
Interference decision reversed in favor of Phillips’s defibrillator patent
Koninklijke Philips Electronics
Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. v. PixelRange, Inc.
Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
Technical Consumer Products, Inc. v. Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
Haier America Trading, L.L.C. v. Koninklijke Philips N.V. et al.
Koninklijke Philips N.V. et al.
Koninklijke Philips NV f/k/a Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV v. Ideavillage Products Corp.
Koninklijke Philips NV f/k/a Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV
Toyota Motor Corp.
Interval Licensing LLC v. AOL, Inc.
AOL, Inc.
Smart Solutions Technologies, S.L. v. Koninklijke Philips N.V.
Koninklijke Philips N.V.
District court enters judgment of noninfringement for Finnegan client Philips
Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.