Experience
Gardner
Toyota Motor Corp.
Represented Toyota in a utility patent litigation related to the hybrid-engine system found in the Prius. The court granted summary judgment of non-infringement on all Toyota products prior to trial.
Gardner v. Toyota Motor Corp., 2:08-cv-00632, W.D. Wash., Judge Jones
Intellectual Ventures I LLC et al. v. Toyota Motor Corp. et al.
Toyota Motor Corp. et al.
Manitto Technologies, Inc. v. Toyota Motor Corp.
Toyota Motor Corp.
Interference decision reversed in favor of Phillips’s defibrillator patent
Koninklijke Philips Electronics
Koninklijke Philips Electronics, N.V. v. Cardiac Science Operating Co.
Koninklijke Philips Electronics, N.V.
Zymogenetics, Inc. v. Immunex Corp.
Immunex Corp.
GTS Duratek; BNFL Inc.
Matrix Motors v. Toyota Motor Sales
Toyota Motor Sales
REC Software USA, Inc. v. LG Electronics USA, Inc.
LG Electronics USA, Inc.
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.