直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Experience

Interference decision reversed in favor of Phillips’s defibrillator patent

Koninklijke Philips Electronics

Cardiac Science Operating Co.

The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington ruled in favor of Finnegan client Philips following a trial in Koninklijke Philips Electronics v. Cardiac Science Operating Co.  The Court found that Cardiac Science’s patent application did not support the claims copied from Philips’s defibrillator patent and reversed the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's decision against Philips in an interference.

Koninklijke Philips Electronics v. Cardiac Science Operating Co., 2:08-cv-00543, W.D. Wash., Judge Pechman

Related Practices

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Patent Litigation and Trials

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

Interferences

Related Industries

Electrical and Computer Technology

Life Sciences

Medical Device and Diagnostics

Related Experiences

Summary judgment of no infringement granted in favor of Trudeau Corporation

Trudeau Corp.

Koninklijke Philips Electronics, N.V. v. Cardiac Science Operating Co.

Koninklijke Philips Electronics, N.V.

Summary judgment of patent invalidity granted in favor of Finnegan client SinterFire Corporation

SinterFire Corp.

Examiner's rejection reversed in favor of Finnegan client BrainScope

BrainScope

Gardner v. Toyota Motor Corp.

Toyota Motor Corp.

Federal Circuit reverses district court ruling of invalidity and upholds rulings on other grounds in favor of Finnegan client Eli Lilly and Co.

Eli Lilly and Company

Inter partes reexamination ruling reversed in favor of Finnegan client Asetek

Asetek

Examiner's rejection reversed in favor of Finnegan client Yazaki Corporation

Yazaki Corp.

PQ Corp. v. Johnson Matthey PLC

PQ Corp.

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP