Protecting a blockbuster diabetes treatment for AstraZeneca
AstraZeneca AB
Major victories across IP venues for Volkswagen, Audi, Bentley, and Lamborghini
Audi AG; Audi of America, LLC; Automobili Lamborghini America, LLC; Automobili Lamborghini S.p.A.; Bentley Motors Limited; Bentley Motors, Inc; Volkswagen AG; Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
No confusion in trademark victory on summary judgment for the American Retirement Association
American Retirement Association
Finnegan helps Intellia Therapeutics acquire Rewrite Therapeutics, Inc. for $45 million
Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.
Finnegan secures favorable ITC ruling related to innovative electric SUVs for BMW
BMW of North America, LLC and Bayerische Motoren Werke AG
Finnegan fights for Sony’s “exceedingly famous” mark
Sony Group Corporation
Experience
In Re Certain Polycrystalline Diamond Compacts and Articles Containing Same In Re Certain Polycrystalline Diamond Compacts and Articles Containing Same
337-TA-1236 , ITC, Judge Elliot
Experience
Google, Inc. v. Uniloc USA Google, Inc. v. Uniloc USA
IPR2017-01683, -01684, -01685, PTAB, Judges Barrett, Chung, Easthom, Smith
Experience
Välinge Innovation AB v. Halstead New England Corporation, The Home Depot Inc. et al. Välinge Innovation AB v. Halstead New England Corporation, The Home Depot Inc. et al.
1:16-cv-01082, D. Del., Judges Stark, Burke
Experience
FIS successfully uses PTAB to invalidate quintessential “Business Method Patents” FIS successfully uses PTAB to invalidate quintessential “Business Method Patents”
2:17-cv-00432, E.D. Tex., Judges Gilstrap, Payne
CBM2014-00020, -00021, PTAB, Judges Clements, Saindon, Tierney
16-1046, -1048, Fed. Cir., Judges Chen, Moore, Wallach
16-883, S. Ct.
Experience
Unified Patents prevails in Federal Circuit appeal challenging PTAB final written decision Unified Patents prevails in Federal Circuit appeal challenging PTAB final written decision
15-1799, Fed. Cir., Judges Dyk, Newman, Wallach
Experience
Chart Inc. v. GP Strategies Corp. Chart Inc. v. GP Strategies Corp.
3:14-cv-00097, S.D. Cal., Judges Bartick, Battaglia, Benitiz
Experience
Koninklijke Philips NV v. Wangs Alliance Corporation Koninklijke Philips NV v. Wangs Alliance Corporation
1:14-cv-12298, D. Mass., Judge Casper
IPR2015-01289, -01290, -01292, -01293, -01294, -01453, -01455, PTAB, Judges Perry, Jefferson, Quinn
Experience
Guangdong Xinbao Electrical Appliances Holdings Co. v. Adrian Rivera Guangdong Xinbao Electrical Appliances Holdings Co. v. Adrian Rivera
IPR2014-00042, PTAB, Judges Bonilla, Cocks, Prats
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.