Experience
Philips Lighting
Wangs Alliance Corporation
Finnegan defended plaintiff Philips Lighting (now known as Signify) in a patent infringement suit relating to light-emitting diode (LED) lighting devices and power supplies and successfully defended Philips Lighting in inter partes reviews (IPRs) filed against seven patents, with claims in each patent found not unpatentable. The suit resulted in settlement.
Philips Lighting v. Wangs Alliance Corporation, 1:14-cv-12298, D. Mass., Judge Casper
Philips Lighting v. Wangs Alliance Corporation, IPR2015-01289, -01290, -01292, -01293, -01294, -01453, -01455, PTAB, Judges Perry, Jefferson, Quinn
Koninklijke Philips NV f/k/a Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV v. Ideavillage Products Corp.
Koninklijke Philips NV f/k/a Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV
Koninklijke Philips NV v. Nintendo Co., Ltd.
Koninklijke Philips NV
Koninklijke Philips NV and IP2IPO Innovations, Ltd. v. Boston Scientific Corp.
Koninklijke Philips NV and IP2IPO Innovations, Ltd.
Tamabo, Inc. v. Koninklijke Philips NV
Philips Electronics
Koninklijke Philips N.V. et al. v. Schreder Lighting LLC, et al.
Koninklijke Philips N.V.
University of Florida Research Foundation, Inc. v. Koninklijke Philips NV
Koninklijke Philips NV
Koninklijke Philips NV et al. v. Tongfang Global Inc. et al.
Koninklijke Philips NV et al.
Koninklijke Philips N.V. et al. v. Amerlux, LLC, et al.
Koninklijke Philips N.V.
Koninklijke Philips N.V. et al. v. Roy-CSL Lighting, Inc.
Koninklijke Philips N.V.
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.