Experience
Matrix Motors
Toyota Motor Sales
Counsel for Toyota in a case brought by Matrix Motor Company, Inc., alleging that the Toyota Matrix passenger car infringed the Matrix trademark allegedly used for race cars and related components and parts. The court granted a summary judgement in favor of Toyota Motor Sales, affirming that Matrix Motors had not engaged in sufficient use of the mark on automobiles to establish trademark rights.
Matrix Motors v. Toyota Motor Sales, 03-56359, 9th Cir., Judges Schroeder, Gould, Clifton
Toyota Motor Corp. v. Innovative Display Technologies, LLC
Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Motor Corp.
Intellectual Ventures I LLC et al. v. Toyota Motor Corp. et al.
Toyota Motor Corp. et al.
Manitto Technologies, Inc. v. Toyota Motor Corp.
Toyota Motor Corp.
Toyota Motor Corporation v. General Electric Co./GE Hybrid Technologies, LLC.
Toyota Motor Corporation
Innovative Display Techs. LLC v. Hyundai Motor Co.
Toyota Motor Corp.
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.