直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Experience

ITC victory keeps U.S. market open for Mitsubishi wind turbines

General Electric Co.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.

Finnegan represented Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. and Mitsubishi Power Systems America, Inc. against General Electric in a U.S. International Trade Commission investigation. The ITC ruled in favor of Mitsubishi, terminating a Section 337 investigation based on a General Electric complaint alleging patent infringement by Mitsubishi’s 2.4 Megawatt variable speed wind turbines. The Commission ruling of no violation overturned an earlier finding by an ITC administrative law judge that two of GE’s patents had been violated. The result of the ruling was that Mitsubishi remained free to import and sell its wind turbines in the U.S. market. GE appealed that ITC ruling to the Federal Circuit, which affirmed that ITC’s decision on one of the three patents involved, dismissed the appeal regarding one patent which had expired during the appeal process, and remanded the matter to the Federal Circuit for reconsideration of certain issues regarding the third patent at issue. During the reconsideration process GE and MHI reached a settlement of their overall dispute, and have moved the ITC to dismiss the remanded action. The result of all this is that the ITC took no action to disturb MHI’s imports. The settlement resulted in a license of GE’s world wide wind turbine technology to MHI.

Certain Variable Speed Wind Turbines, 337-TA-641, ITC, Judge Charneski

General Electric Co. v. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd., 10-1223, Fed. Cir., Judges Linn, Newman, Rader

Related Professionals

Naoki Yoshida
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 6057
Email
Jeffrey C. Totten
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4232
Email
Tyler M. Akagi
Of Counsel
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4385
Email
Michael E. Kudravetz
Litigation Counsel
Boston, MA
+1 617 646 1663
Email
David N. Lefcowitz
Associate
Reston, VA
+1 571 203 2758
Email

Related Practices

Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy

Federal Circuit and Supreme Court Appeals

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Patent Litigation and Trials

ITC Section 337 Investigations and Trials

Related Industries

Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials

Manufacturing

Energy

Clean Energy and Renewables

Related Experiences

Certain Variable Speed Wind Turbine Generators and Components Thereof

Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy Inc. et al.

Federal Circuit rules in favor of Finnegan client InterDigital in appeal from ITC case

InterDigital Communications Corp.

General Electric Co. v. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Limited

Protecting Crucible Materials Corporation from eight competitors

Crucible Materials

Victory at the ITC and Federal Circuit keeps the U.S. market open for Hoechst

Hoechst AG

Certain Surgical Stapler Devices and Components Thereof

Covidien LP

Ajinomoto Co., Inc. et al. v. CJ Cheiljedang Corp. et al.

Ajinomoto Company, Inc. et al.

ITC issues final determination in favor of Finnegan client SKC

SKC Kolon PI, Inc.

Defending ADT, Actron AG, and Tokai Denshi against attempt to block importation of resonate tags

ADT, Actron AG, Tokai Denshi

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP