Experience
Crucible Materials
San Huan New Materials High Tech Inc., Ningbo Konit Industries, Inc., and Tridus International, Inc.
On behalf of Crucible Materials, we filed an ITC patent infringement case involving industrial neodymium-iron-boron magnets and prevailed against all eight respondents. We obtained a combination of consent orders, cease and desist orders, limited exclusion orders, and general exclusion orders against Chinese competitors. The general exclusion order prohibits all of Crucible’s foreign competitors from importing infringing magnets, regardless of whether they were parties to the ITC case. We later brought an enforcement action that resulted in civil penalties of $1.5 million against several respondents. The civil penalty was affirmed on appeal.
Neodymium-Iron-Boron Magnets, Magnet Alloys, and Articles Containing the Same, 337-TA-372, ITC, Judge Luckern
Crucible Materials v. ITC, 97-1409, -1411, Fed. Cir., Judges Newman, Smith, Rich
Summary judgment of immunity from infringement granted in favor of Accuride Corporation
Accuride Corp.
Federal Circuit rules in favor of Finnegan client InterDigital in appeal from ITC case
InterDigital Communications Corp.
Innolux Corporation v. Applied Materials, Inc.
Innolux Corporation
Telcordia Technologies
Resolving an appropriate standard for what Is “material” information in patent prosecution
Digital Control, Inc.
ITC issues final determination in favor of Finnegan client SKC
SKC Kolon PI, Inc.
Bay Materials, LLC v. 3M Company
Bay Materials, LLC
Daicel Corporation v. Celanese International Corp.
Celanese International Corp.
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.