直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Experience

Protecting Crucible Materials Corporation from eight competitors

Crucible Materials

San Huan New Materials High Tech Inc., Ningbo Konit Industries, Inc., and Tridus International, Inc.

On behalf of Crucible Materials, we filed an ITC patent infringement case involving industrial neodymium-iron-boron magnets and prevailed against all eight respondents. We obtained a combination of consent orders, cease and desist orders, limited exclusion orders, and general exclusion orders against Chinese competitors. The general exclusion order prohibits all of Crucible’s foreign competitors from importing infringing magnets, regardless of whether they were parties to the ITC case. We later brought an enforcement action that resulted in civil penalties of $1.5 million against several respondents. The civil penalty was affirmed on appeal.

Neodymium-Iron-Boron Magnets, Magnet Alloys, and Articles Containing the Same, 337-TA-372, ITC, Judge Luckern

Crucible Materials v. ITC, 97-1409, -1411, Fed. Cir., Judges Newman, Smith, Rich

Related Practices

Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy

Federal Circuit and Supreme Court Appeals

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

ITC Section 337 Investigations and Trials

Related Industries

Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials

Manufacturing

Chemical

Energy

Related Experiences

Summary judgment of immunity from infringement granted in favor of Accuride Corporation

Accuride Corp.

Federal Circuit rules in favor of Finnegan client InterDigital in appeal from ITC case

InterDigital Communications Corp.

Innolux Corporation v. Applied Materials, Inc.

Innolux Corporation

Federal Circuit affirms $6.5 million damages award for Finnegan client Telcordia Technologies from Cisco Systems

Telcordia Technologies

Resolving an appropriate standard for what Is “material” information in patent prosecution

Digital Control, Inc.

ITC issues final determination in favor of Finnegan client SKC

SKC Kolon PI, Inc.

U.S. market remains open for TEAC Corporation

TEAC Corp.

Bay Materials, LLC v. 3M Company

Bay Materials, LLC

Daicel Corporation v. Celanese International Corp.

Celanese International Corp.

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP