直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

European IP Blog

Edwards v. Boohoo: Weaving Through the Challenges of Unregistered Design Claims in Fast Fashion

15 July 2025

Authored and Edited by Eleanor Craig-Fisher; Nessa Khandaker; Clare A. Cornell

Earlier this year, independent designer Sonia Edwards brought a claim against fast-fashion giant Boohoo before the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (IPEC), alleging infringement of her unregistered design rights in several garments. This case spotlighted the inherent challenges of relying on unregistered design rights in the UK, particularly around establishing the subsistence of the right, its scope based on its degree of originality, and whether copying occurred rather than independent creation.

For insights on how to compile persuasive evidence, the strategic advantages of IPEC litigation, and practical steps on how to protect and commercialize IP in a fast-moving industry, find further details as published here.

Tags

apparel

Related Practices

Prosecution and Portfolio Management

Design Rights

Related Industries

Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials

Textiles

Consumer Goods and Services

Consumer Products

Related Offices

London

Contacts

Eleanor Craig-Fisher
Trademark Trainee Attorney
London
+44 (0)20 7864 2838
Email
Nessa Khandaker
Associate
London
+44 (0)20 7864 2828
Email
Clare A. Cornell
Partner
London
+44 (0)20 7864 2815
Email

Copyright © 2025 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 


DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information

Related Insights

Conference

IAM Live: Navigating the UPC 2026

November 3, 2026

Paris

Hybrid Conference

Intellectual Property Law Institute 2026 – California

October 19-20, 2026

San Francisco

Hybrid Conference

Intellectual Property Law Institute 2026 – New York

September 28-29, 2026

New York

Conference

13th Annual Summit for Women Leaders in Life Sciences Law

July 29-30, 2026

Boston

Webinar

Successful Strategies to Win Alice Motions and Fee Awards in Patent Cases Against Non-Practicing Entities

July 22, 2026

Webinar

Conference

2026 China Pharmaceutical Innovation Conference

July 22-24, 2026

Shanghai

Webinar

Early Motions in Trade Secret Litigation – Offensive and Defensive Insights

July 15, 2026

Webinar

Federal Circuit IP Blog

“2” Does Not Provide Written Description Support for “1”: Federal Circuit Affirms District Court’s Invalidation of Patent

July 8, 2026

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Federal Circuit Vacates and Remands Infringement and Damages Judgment After Erroneous Verdict Form and Eligibility Analysis

July 8, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP