直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Commentary

Technology: Friend or Foe? Leading Trademark Practitioners Look to the Future

August 12, 2019

World Trademark Review

World Trademark Review interviewed Finnegan partners Douglas Rettew and Mark Sommers for their thoughts on how technology will impact the future of trademark law and the work of trademark practitioners. 

Doug commented specifically on the potential impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on trademark law. He said, “I do not believe that AI can supplant the ultimate judgement calls that trademark professionals need to make in regard to clearance, prosecution and litigation. However, it can streamline things and make them more efficient. This will likely further manifest itself in clearance searching and litigation document review and production. The prospect of making litigation more efficient is a good and exciting thing. With that, more clients can have their day in court (without breaking the bank) and lawyers can focus their time and attention on the meaty substantive issues.”

Mark commented on how technology will cause brand owners to change the way they do business. He said, “Trademark owners will need to better leverage and enforce the many diverse parts of their source-indicating identities beyond mere words alone, as consumers have come to associate a variety of cues and messages with a given company.” He also provided insight into how trademark practitioners will need to service clients in light of these changes. He said, “Firm practitioners will find long-term success by delivering real, tangible value to their clients through strategic vision and the enforcement of rights that fundamentally matter to their businesses. As most clients have tight cost controls in place, the answer is not to provide slim-margin services, as by doing so, you are positioning your practice as a mass-market provider, which will require substantial volume to succeed and the ability to weather cut-throat competition. Instead, there are plenty of companies that want and need top-tier counselling, rights acquisitions and enforcement.”

Related Practices

Trademark and Brand Management

Related Industries

Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML)

Electrical and Computer Technology

Related Offices

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

Douglas A. Rettew
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4161
Email
Mark Sommers
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4064
Email

Related News

Commentary

New Appellate Opinion in Amazon Biometric Data Case May Signal ‘Narrowing’ Scope of BIPA Litigation, Experts Say

May 20, 2026

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Decisive ITC Victory for Innoscience in Final Determination

May 11, 2026

Commentary

ITC Bars Import of Innoscience Chips Made Before Redesign

May 8, 2026

Commentary

How Litigation Funding Disclosure Could Affect ITC Cases

May 7 , 2026

Award/Ranking

61 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized on the 2025 Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll

May 7, 2026

Award/Ranking

Associates Rank Finnegan “Best of the Best” in BTI Associate Satisfaction Survey

May 7, 2026

Commentary

Justices to Side with Generic Drugmakers in Patent Spat, Attorneys Predict

May 5, 2026

Announcement

Finnegan Partner Ningling Wang Becomes President of Licensing Executives Society International

May 4, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Wins IP Firm of the Year at the 2026 LSPN Awards

May 1, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP