直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Media Mention

Once a Mystery, PTAB Remands Start to Take Shape

February 9, 2017

Law360

Since the introduction of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), a long standing question has been, "What happens when the Federal Circuit sends a case back to the board?" Despite PTAB proceedings beginning in 2012, appeals of PTAB decisions to the Federal Circuit did not begin until 2015. Law360 reached to Finnegan partner Jason E. Stach to discuss some of the trends that have emerged out of PTAB remands.

One challenge that attorneys are facing with PTAB remands is that there is no clear guidance. Stach believes that a framework of rules that address things such as a time frame for parties to request a conference call after the mandate issues from the Federal Circuit would be helpful. He said, "Something like that to give people some guidance and the board some guidance, at least to give a little bit of uniformity to the proceedings. But after that, the remands are going to potentially vary widely in what they cover. So I think at that point it’s going to be a panel-specific, case-specific decision on how the remand is going to proceed." Stach was also asked about outcomes of the cases returned to the PTAB. He said, "Just because you won at the Federal Circuit does not mean that you are necessarily going to win on remand. You still need to do your job and persuade the PTAB, they’re still going to look at it with a careful eye."

Tags

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC), remand

Related Practices

Federal Circuit and Supreme Court Appeals

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

PTAB Invalidation Proceedings: IPR and PGR

Related Professionals

Jason E. Stach
Partner
Atlanta, GA
+1 404 653 6428
Email

Related News

Award/Ranking

Forbes Names Finnegan Partner Erika Harmon Arner on its Inaugural 2026 America’s Top Women Lawyers List

June 5, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Earns Top Rankings in 2026 IAM Patent 1000 Guide; Nearly 60 Attorneys Ranked

May 28, 2026

Commentary

Quince Aims to Have ‘Dupe’ Evidence Shape Ugg Shoe Patent Trial

May 26, 2026

Commentary

New Appellate Opinion in Amazon Biometric Data Case May Signal ‘Narrowing’ Scope of BIPA Litigation, Experts Say

May 20, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Partner Antje Brambrink Shortlisted for Women in Business Law EMEA Award

May 13, 2026

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Decisive ITC Victory for Innoscience in Final Determination

May 11, 2026

Award/Ranking

Associates Rank Finnegan “Best of the Best” in BTI Associate Satisfaction Survey

May 7, 2026

Award/Ranking

61 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized on the 2025 Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll

May 7, 2026

Commentary

How Litigation Funding Disclosure Could Affect ITC Cases

May 7 , 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP