直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Firm
  • Offices
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management

Media Mention

Once a Mystery, PTAB Remands Start to Take Shape

February 9, 2017

Law360

Since the introduction of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), a long standing question has been, "What happens when the Federal Circuit sends a case back to the board?" Despite PTAB proceedings beginning in 2012, appeals of PTAB decisions to the Federal Circuit did not begin until 2015. Law360 reached to Finnegan partner Jason E. Stach to discuss some of the trends that have emerged out of PTAB remands.

One challenge that attorneys are facing with PTAB remands is that there is no clear guidance. Stach believes that a framework of rules that address things such as a time frame for parties to request a conference call after the mandate issues from the Federal Circuit would be helpful. He said, "Something like that to give people some guidance and the board some guidance, at least to give a little bit of uniformity to the proceedings. But after that, the remands are going to potentially vary widely in what they cover. So I think at that point it’s going to be a panel-specific, case-specific decision on how the remand is going to proceed." Stach was also asked about outcomes of the cases returned to the PTAB. He said, "Just because you won at the Federal Circuit does not mean that you are necessarily going to win on remand. You still need to do your job and persuade the PTAB, they’re still going to look at it with a careful eye."

Tags

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC), remand

Related Practices

Appeals

Patent Invalidation Proceedings

PTAB Post-Grant Review: IPR, PGR, and CBM

Related Professionals

Jason_Stach
Jason E. Stach
Partner
Atlanta, GA
+1 404 653 6428
Email

Related News

Commentary

Hermès Motions to Block Metabirkin NFT Sales Following Trial

March 8, 2023

Commentary

Why IP Firm Finnegan Is Investing in a New Privacy Practice

March 8, 2023

Media Mention

Finnegan Shortlisted in 10 Categories in the Managing IP Awards 2023

March 6, 2023

Commentary

Finnegan Hires DHS Privacy Chief to Spearhead New Practice

March 1, 2023

Commentary

Vidal Revives Baby Swaddle Patent Claims Axed by PTAB

February 24, 2023

Media Mention

Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout Outs: Castle Retail Group

February 24, 2023

Press Release

ITC Names Finnegan Partner Doris Johnson Hines an Administrative Law Judge

February 23, 2023

Commentary

What the Patent Bar Is Saying About the USPTO’s Call for Comments on AI Inventorship

February 19, 2023

Commentary

These Firms Are Pulling In The Most PTAB Work

February 17, 2023

Due to international data regulations, we’ve recently updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

The Finnegan UPC Hub is a one-stop shop for our insights related to the Unified Patent Court (UPC).

Finnegan
Click Here
  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • EEO Statement

© 2023 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP