February 9, 2015
Managing Intellectual Property
On February 4, 2015, the Federal Circuit released its first opinion on a Patent Trial and Appeal Board appeal, In Re Cuozzo Speed Technologies. Managing Intellectual Property contacted Finnegan attorney Timothy McAnulty to discuss the importance of this opinion on an inter partes review appeal that “affirmed the Board’s final determination, and found no error in the Board’s claim construction under the broadest reasonable interpretation standard, the Board’s obviousness determination, and the Board’s denial of Cuozzo’s motion to amend.” McAnulty, citing Judge Pauline Newman's decent, stated, "The opinion addresses several of the leading issues, but the split panel still highlights the different views on IPRs and the AIA." He goes on to state "Perhaps more notably, the majority held the Federal Circuit lacks jurisdiction to review the Office’s institution decision even after a final written decision."
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC), America Invents Act (AIA), Cuozzo Speed Technologies LLC v. Lee
Press Release
October 6, 2026
Commentary
Federal Circuit Revives Whistleblower Complaint Over VA's AI Claims-Processing Tool
September 25, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Named an IP Litigation Powerhouse in BTI Litigation Outlook 2027
September 24, 2026
Press Release
Finnegan Secures Precedential Pro Bono Federal Circuit Victory for AI Whistleblower
September 23, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Receives Top Tier Rankings in World Trademark Review’s Inaugural Copyright 1000 2026
September 23, 2026
Commentary
New Thomas Pink Womenswear Lines Strain ‘Pink’ Pact with Victoria’s Secret
September 21, 2026
Commentary
Pepsi's U.S. Trademark Dispute Could Reshape Brand Choices, Lawsuit Strategy, Lawyers Say
September 17, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.