February 9, 2015
Managing Intellectual Property
On February 4, 2015, the Federal Circuit released its first opinion on a Patent Trial and Appeal Board appeal, In Re Cuozzo Speed Technologies. Managing Intellectual Property contacted Finnegan attorney Timothy McAnulty to discuss the importance of this opinion on an inter partes review appeal that “affirmed the Board’s final determination, and found no error in the Board’s claim construction under the broadest reasonable interpretation standard, the Board’s obviousness determination, and the Board’s denial of Cuozzo’s motion to amend.” McAnulty, citing Judge Pauline Newman's decent, stated, "The opinion addresses several of the leading issues, but the split panel still highlights the different views on IPRs and the AIA." He goes on to state "Perhaps more notably, the majority held the Federal Circuit lacks jurisdiction to review the Office’s institution decision even after a final written decision."
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC), America Invents Act (AIA), Cuozzo Speed Technologies LLC v. Lee
Media Mention
Women in Business Law Americas Awards 2024: Three Finnegan Attorneys Shortlisted
April 7, 2024
Press Release
Finnegan and BMW Group Successfully Demolish Non-Practicing Entity NorthStar’s Efforts
April 3, 2024
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.