直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Media Mention

DC Football Trademark Ruling Won't Affect Merchandising

July 9, 2015

Corporate Counsel

On July 8, 2015, a Virginia federal district judge upheld the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board’s (TTAB) decision to cancel the Washington Redskins’ trademark registration. The judge agreed with the TTAB, noting that a substantial number of Native American find the term “Redskins” to be disparaging. Corporate Counsel contacted Finnegan attorney Mark Sommers to find out what this decision means for the football franchise going forward.

Sommers noted that although the trademark registration has been canceled, the franchise has common law trademark rights, which are not affected by the decision. This means that the judgment does not prohibit the franchise from selling merchandise with the team name. Whether or not the franchise stops using the marks are a business decision that is beyond the purview of the district court’s jurisdiction. The franchise is expected to appeal the decision to the Federal Circuit.

Tags

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB)

Related Practices

Trademark and Brand Management

Trademark Oppositions and Cancellations

Trademark Litigation and Trials

Related Professionals

Mark Sommers
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4064
Email

Related News

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Summary Determination of No Violation in ITC Vehicle Space Guards Investigation for Drop Stop

October 6, 2026

Commentary

Federal Circuit Revives Whistleblower Complaint Over VA's AI Claims-Processing Tool

September 25, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Named an IP Litigation Powerhouse in BTI Litigation Outlook 2027

September 24, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Receives Top Tier Rankings in World Trademark Review’s Inaugural Copyright 1000 2026

September 23, 2026

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Precedential Pro Bono Federal Circuit Victory for AI Whistleblower

September 23, 2026

Commentary

New Thomas Pink Womenswear Lines Strain ‘Pink’ Pact with Victoria’s Secret

September 21, 2026

Commentary

Pepsi's U.S. Trademark Dispute Could Reshape Brand Choices, Lawsuit Strategy, Lawyers Say

September 17, 2026

Commentary

Jellycat’s ‘Dupe’ Dilemma: Can IP Protect a ‘Cute’ Aesthetic?

September 16, 2026

Commentary

Uncrustables Fame Ruling Sets Up Functionality Fight Over Crimped Edge

September 11, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP