December 26, 2011
The National Law Journal
During the past year, there were many rulings in appellate courts that changed the legal patent landscape. In one such ruling, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit changed common patent damages calculation canon for a licensee's opening reasonable royalty offer to a patent holder during a hypothetical negotiation, the so-called 25% rule. The unanimous panel in Uniloc USA Inc. v. Microsoft Corp. on January 4, 2011 “basically [set] forth additional guidelines in terms of what is appropriate and inappropriate in a damages case," said Finnegan partner Donald R. Dunner, Uniloc’s appellate attorney in this matter.
Commentary
Patent Strategy Could Shape Financing, Valuation and Risk in Offshore Energy Projects
June 30, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan’s European Practices and Attorneys Highlighted in 2026 Managing IP Rankings
June 25, 2026
Press Release
BMW Obtains Preliminary Injunction Against Zync; Federal Court Orders Zync to Halt ITC Trade Secret
June 23, 2026
Award/Ranking
Six Finnegan Partners Recognized in the 2026 Lawdragon 500 Leading Global IP Lawyers
June 22, 2026
Commentary
U.S. Judge Rules Forum-Selection Clause Bars Zync from Pursuing ITC Trade Secret Case
June 15, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.