December 26, 2011
The National Law Journal
During the past year, there were many rulings in appellate courts that changed the legal patent landscape. In one such ruling, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit changed common patent damages calculation canon for a licensee's opening reasonable royalty offer to a patent holder during a hypothetical negotiation, the so-called 25% rule. The unanimous panel in Uniloc USA Inc. v. Microsoft Corp. on January 4, 2011 “basically [set] forth additional guidelines in terms of what is appropriate and inappropriate in a damages case," said Finnegan partner Donald R. Dunner, Uniloc’s appellate attorney in this matter.
Press Release
October 6, 2026
Commentary
Federal Circuit Revives Whistleblower Complaint Over VA's AI Claims-Processing Tool
September 25, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Named an IP Litigation Powerhouse in BTI Litigation Outlook 2027
September 24, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Receives Top Tier Rankings in World Trademark Review’s Inaugural Copyright 1000 2026
September 23, 2026
Commentary
New Thomas Pink Womenswear Lines Strain ‘Pink’ Pact with Victoria’s Secret
September 21, 2026
Commentary
Pepsi's U.S. Trademark Dispute Could Reshape Brand Choices, Lawsuit Strategy, Lawyers Say
September 17, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.