直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Commentary

Acting USPTO Director Enacts New PTAB Policy with Motorola Decision

March 31, 2025

World Intellectual Property Review

The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) acting director Coke Morgan Stewart made her first Fintiv decision by throwing out Motorola’s challenges to a rival’s body-worn camera patents. This decision comes two days after she established director authority over discretionary denial policy at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). The involved patents are owned by video tech firm Stellar, which sued Motorola in August 2023 over alleged infringement of patents covering police body camera technology.

In her decision, Morgan allowed director review; vacated the board’s decision granting institution, finding the board’s Fintiv analysis to be “erroneous”; and denied institution of inter partes review.

The PTAB already agreed to review Motorola’s challenges to the validity of eight Stellar patents that include police body camera technology and in-car video systems. Just two days before the Motorola decision, she issued a memorandum to all Administrative Patent Judges of the PTAB detailing a new interim process for workload management.

Finnegan partner Forrest Jones told World IP Review  that, “It doesn’t seem like this interim bifurcated procedure for discretionary denials will create much in the way of efficiency, mainly because the strength of the petition is inherently one of the considerations for discretionary denials.”

“So, instead of three ALJs considering the merits of the petition in an institution decision, this procedure will require six ALJs and the director to consider the same thing,” he said.

Read “Acting USPTO Director Enacts New PTAB Policy With Motorola Decision”

Related Practices

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

PTAB Invalidation Proceedings: IPR and PGR

Related Offices

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

Forrest A. Jones
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4019
Email

Related News

Press Release

Finnegan Expands U.S. Platform with Launch of Dallas Office

September 2, 2026

Commentary

Early Test of USPTO's Ex Parte Preorder Filing Leads to Re-Exam Denial

August 21, 2026

Commentary

East Texas Reclaims Its Patent Crown

August 21, 2026

Award/Ranking

31 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers 2027

August 20, 2026

Press Release

USPTO Denies Super Lighting Reexamination Request Following PVTECH Pre-Order Submission Under New USPTO Procedure

August 19, 2026

Commentary

Why Global IP Litigants Keep Turning to English Courts

August 19, 2026

Press Release

Federal Circuit Overrules Precedent En Banc in Finnegan Pro Bono Victory for Federally Employed Veterans

August 18, 2026

Commentary

Fed. Circ. Overrules Precedent on Veteran Hiring Protections

August 14, 2026

Award/Ranking

Fourteen Finnegan Attorneys Named to the 2026 IAM Strategy 300 List

August 13, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP