汽车 是本所业务分支,下属于 消费品和服务业, 电子和信息科技, and 运输和物流.
永不止步的技术改进
为了跟上客户对新设计和功能不断变化的需求,汽车工业及汽车供应商正在寻求不断创新。混合动力技术、车载网络系统、安全摄像机、后视雷达和非触控尾门是过去五年所取得重大进步的一小部分。除了上述创新之外,汽车供电行业还新开发了视音频设备、电力供应系统、传感器以及动力传动系统和底盘系统线束。为了扩大市场份额,提高盈利能力以及保持竞争力,汽车制造商和供应商不断寻求开发新的产品线,加强供应链,改进库存控制,整合或外包资源以提高效率,确定替代零部件。这类创新者需要可靠的知识产权保护。凭借长期与创新汽车制造商和供应商合作,美国飞翰律师事务所提供法律策略,为汽车行业宝贵的知识产权资产提供保护、辩护和利用手段。
了解法律和突破性科技
保护汽车制造和供应产业取得的进步需要一支跨领域知识产权团队。美国飞翰律师事务所的律师和专业人员在电气、计算机、机械工程和材料科学方面拥有丰富的经验。在我们的专业人员中,超过50人曾担任过美国专利审查员,多人拥有汽车相关领域的工作经验,如变速器、动力传动系统、悬架系统、制动和制动系统、润滑和冷却系统、车体和零部件、泵阀组件、汽车座椅和其他内饰物品(包括安全气囊和其他安全装置)、排气系统、GPS等导向系统、仪器仪表、电池、交流发电机和发电机、燃料电池、混合动力车、轮胎和车轮以及各种类型的发动机系统。在涉及复杂事项的高风险案件中,我们的专业人员凭借法律和技术背景,针对具有重大法律和商业影响的问题为客户提供意见和建议。
从确定新产品的竞争状况到制定胜诉策略,我们为汽车客户提供全方位的服务,其中包括:
不同客户群
我们同各种规模的创新客户合作,包括《财富》百强和全球1000强企业:
Obtained complete victory against Carrum on appeal of the District of Delaware’s claim construction to the Federal Circuit following Carrum’s stipulation of non-infringement under the claim construction, thereby exonerating BMW’s ACC system, first sold in 2000, against Carrum’s 2004 patents. Invalidated several asserted claims through post-grant efforts before the U.S. Patent Office, including IPRs and EPRs, and pursued claims through proceedings before the Eastern District of Virginia to vindicate BMW’s patent challenges.
1:18-cv-01645, D. Del., Judge Andrews
21-1435, 24-1480, Fed. Cir., Judges Clevenger, Cunningham, Lourie, Moore, Prost, Taranto
IPR2019-00902, -00903, -00904, -00905, -00927, 00928, PTAB, Judges Browne, Scanlon, Tornquist
90/019,010, CRU
Obtained a swift, cost-effective walk-away in the Southern District of Texas by showing that Ad Innovations’ infringement theory accused a feature not present in the U.S.
3:25-cv-00179, S.D. Tex., Judge Brown
Secured a covenant-not-to-sue and zero-dollar walkaway for BMW Group in a declaratory judgment action, concluding Arigna’s high-profile patent enforcement campaign involving current amplification technology. This outcome follows a decisive ITC victory, the dismissal of parallel District Court litigation, and multiple concurrent patent office challenges pending at the time of resolution.
1:23-cv-01190, D.D.C., Judge Contreras
2:21-cv-00173, E.D. Tex.
IPR2021-01531, PTAB, Judges Baer, Fenick, Iftikhar
23-1931, Fed. Cir.
90/019,261, USPTO
4:23-cv-02961, S.D. Tex., Judge Rosenthal
2:22-cv-00486, E.D. Tex., Judge Gilstrap
6:23-cv-00456, W.D. Tex., Judge Albright
IPR2023-00890, -00934, -01017,-01049, -01190, -01191, PTAB, Judges Droesch, Flax, Petravick, Wood
337-TA-1267, ITC, Judge Bhattacharyya
IPR2021-01321, -01531, PTAB, Judges Baer, Fenick, Iftikhar
2:21-cv-00054; -00172, E.D. Tex., Judge Gilstrap
Articles
California Reaches Record $12.75 Million CCPA Settlement with General Motors Over Driver Data
June 4, 2026
At the PTAB Blog
Discretion All the Way Down: USPTO Uses a Discretionary IPR Denial to Justify a
§ 325(d) EPR Denial
May 28, 2026
Federal Circuit IP Blog
Federal Circuit Affirms § 102(b) Invalidity; Source Code Commands Are Not Hearsay
May 14, 2026
Federal Circuit IP Blog
Federal Circuit Reverses Indefiniteness Ruling on Means-Plus-Function Claim
April 15, 2026
European IP Blog
Munich Regional Court I Grants Avago Injunction Against Renault After Calculating a FRAND Rate
4 March 2026
At the PTAB Blog
February 24, 2026
Commentary
BMW Uses Forum-Selection Clause to Shut Down ITC Trade Secret Investigation
July 31, 2026
Press Release
BMW Secures Landmark ITC Victory: ALJ Terminates Zync Investigation Based on Forum-Selection Clause
July 29, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.