March 22, 2011
The American Lawyer
On Monday, the U.S. Solicitor General submitted a brief that supports i4i in it’s case against Microsoft, over the definition by which a patent is ruled invalid. The brief affirmed the current “clear and convincing” standard is appropriate, versus Microsoft’s “preponderance of evidence” standard. "I find it refreshing that the government came out for i4i," said i4i counsel and Finnegan partner, Donald Dunner. "Changing the burden of proof would have negative effects not only on innovation, but also on the patent office's efforts to be efficient."
Commentary
Patent Strategy Could Shape Financing, Valuation and Risk in Offshore Energy Projects
June 30, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan’s European Practices and Attorneys Highlighted in 2026 Managing IP Rankings
June 25, 2026
Press Release
BMW Obtains Preliminary Injunction Against Zync; Federal Court Orders Zync to Halt ITC Trade Secret
June 23, 2026
Award/Ranking
Six Finnegan Partners Recognized in the 2026 Lawdragon 500 Leading Global IP Lawyers
June 22, 2026
Commentary
U.S. Judge Rules Forum-Selection Clause Bars Zync from Pursuing ITC Trade Secret Case
June 15, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.