March 22, 2011
The American Lawyer
On Monday, the U.S. Solicitor General submitted a brief that supports i4i in it’s case against Microsoft, over the definition by which a patent is ruled invalid. The brief affirmed the current “clear and convincing” standard is appropriate, versus Microsoft’s “preponderance of evidence” standard. "I find it refreshing that the government came out for i4i," said i4i counsel and Finnegan partner, Donald Dunner. "Changing the burden of proof would have negative effects not only on innovation, but also on the patent office's efforts to be efficient."
Press Release
October 6, 2026
Commentary
Federal Circuit Revives Whistleblower Complaint Over VA's AI Claims-Processing Tool
September 25, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Named an IP Litigation Powerhouse in BTI Litigation Outlook 2027
September 24, 2026
Press Release
Finnegan Secures Precedential Pro Bono Federal Circuit Victory for AI Whistleblower
September 23, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Receives Top Tier Rankings in World Trademark Review’s Inaugural Copyright 1000 2026
September 23, 2026
Commentary
New Thomas Pink Womenswear Lines Strain ‘Pink’ Pact with Victoria’s Secret
September 21, 2026
Commentary
Pepsi's U.S. Trademark Dispute Could Reshape Brand Choices, Lawsuit Strategy, Lawyers Say
September 17, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.