直 Japanese PDF Font
  • 我们的专业人员
  • 服务
  • 我们的见解
  • 办公室
  • 事务所
  • 人才招聘
Finnegan
  • 新闻
  • 飞翰事实
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • 慈善性法律援助
  • 管理层
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

James R. Barney

Federal Circuit PTAB Appeal Statistics, and How the Board Handles Remands

January 18, 2017

Managing Intellectual Property

In its January 18, 2017 article, Managing Intellectual Property took a close look at Finnegan's AIA Blog posts to examine Federal Circuit Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) appeal statistics, as well as what parties can expect from cases that are remanded.

As of the start of 2017, the Federal Circuit had decided 155 PTAB appeals from inter partes review (IPR) and covered business method (CBM) reviews. In about 77% of those cases, the court had affirmed the PTAB on every issue and reversed or vacated the PTAB on every issue in about 8% of the cases. As of January 1, approximately 53% of cases were issued as Rule 36.

In a December blog post, Finnegan discussed what can be expected from the PTAB on remand. Since there are no specified deadlines for remanded cases, it has not been clear as to how remands will be treated. So far, once the Federal Circuit’s mandate has issued, jurisdiction returns to the Board and a teleconference with the PTAB may occur within a week to a month after the mandate issues. Then, the PTAB authorizes the parties to submit briefs explaining the impact of the Federal Circuit's ruling. Briefing by the petitioner and patent owner typically occurs at the same time, but sometimes it is staggered to give the patent owner an extra week. Parties can expect a three to six month wait from the date of the Federal Circuit's mandate for the PTAB to issue its new final written decision on remand.

Tags

remand, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC)

Related Practices

专利局无效程序

PTAB无效程序:双方复审及授权后复审

联邦巡回法院和最高法院上诉

Related News

Media Mention

Federal Circuit Backs Volkswagen’s $207,500 Fees Against NPE

August 19, 2026

Media Mention

VW Wins in Patent Appeal Over Electrically Controlled Glasses

August 19, 2026

Press Release

Federal Circuit Overrules Precedent En Banc in Finnegan Pro Bono Victory for Federally Employed Veterans

August 18, 2026

Award/Ranking

Partner Jeffrey M. Jacobstein Named Finalist for New England Legal Awards

August 10, 2026

Press Release

Ninth Circuit Denies Zync’s Emergency Motion to Stay; BMW’s Preliminary Injunction Remains in Full Effect as Zync Moves to Stay ITC Proceedings

July 24, 2026

Commentary

PTAB Filings Down 81% in Q2 2026 as Patent Challengers Abandon IPR Playbook

July 13, 2026

Press Release

BMW Obtains Preliminary Injunction Against Zync; Federal Court Orders Zync to Halt ITC Trade Secret

June 23, 2026

Award/Ranking

Forbes Names Finnegan Partner Erika Harmon Arner on its Inaugural 2026 America’s Top Women Lawyers List

June 5, 2026

Press Release

BMW AG Secures Complete Victory at Federal Circuit as Onesta IP, LLC Appeal is Dismissed and Costs Awarded to BMW

April 20, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • 隐私
  • 免责申明
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP