The Samsung Electronics Co. v. Apple case is headed to the Supreme Court of the United States and many fashion designers are siding with Apple, as shown by the amicus briefs filed in early August. The issue at hand is whether a company that infringes another company's patents is required to forfeit all profits, even if only certain parts of the item have infringed. Footwear News reached to Finnegan partner Aaron L. Parker for this thoughts.
Parker said, "If you think about it in terms of the fashion industry and footwear, there are hundreds of design patents on different aspects of the shoe, like the sole. Should you be entitled to all profits of the entire shoe if we're only talking about a specific portion of a shoe?" Many IP practitioners believe that a ruling in favor of Samsung would change the patent landscape, as brands historically were required to forfeit all profits, even for a partial violation.
Press Release
Finnegan Secures Decisive ITC Victory for Innoscience in Final Determination
May 11, 2026
Award/Ranking
Associates Rank Finnegan “Best of the Best” in BTI Associate Satisfaction Survey
May 7, 2026
Press Release
Finnegan Enhances Its German and European IP Practice with Björn Kalbfus
April 30, 2026
Commentary
Permanent Injunction Granted to USA Weightlifting Inc., Enjoining Use of Protected Marks
April 24, 2026
Press Release
April 20, 2026
Commentary
‘Efficiency Enhancers, Not Revenue Disruptors’: Lawyers Analyse USPTO’s AI Trademark Tools
April 17, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.