直 Japanese PDF Font
  • 我们的专业人员
  • 服务
  • 我们的见解
  • 办公室
  • 事务所
  • 人才招聘
Finnegan
  • 新闻
  • 飞翰事实
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • 慈善性法律援助
  • 管理层
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

James R. Barney

Fashion Pro-Apple: Design Is Everything

August 12, 2016

Footwear News

The Samsung Electronics Co. v. Apple case is headed to the Supreme Court of the United States and many fashion designers are siding with Apple, as shown by the amicus briefs filed in early August. The issue at hand is whether a company that infringes another company's patents is required to forfeit all profits, even if only certain parts of the item have infringed. Footwear News reached to Finnegan partner Aaron L. Parker for this thoughts.  

Parker said, "If you think about it in terms of the fashion industry and footwear, there are hundreds of design patents on different aspects of the shoe, like the sole. Should you be entitled to all profits of the entire shoe if we're only talking about a specific portion of a shoe?" Many IP practitioners believe that a ruling in favor of Samsung would change the patent landscape, as brands historically were required to forfeit all profits, even for a partial violation.

Tags

Samsung Electronics Co. v. Apple Inc., Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), damages

Related Practices

全球知识产权维权、诉讼与审判

Related Industries

消费品

Related Professionals

Aaron L. Parker
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4387
Email

Related News

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Recognized Again Among Germany’s Leading Law Firms

October 9, 2026

Commentary

Federal Circuit Revives Whistleblower Complaint Over VA's AI Claims-Processing Tool

September 25, 2026

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Precedential Pro Bono Federal Circuit Victory for AI Whistleblower

September 23, 2026

Commentary

New Thomas Pink Womenswear Lines Strain ‘Pink’ Pact with Victoria’s Secret

September 21, 2026

Commentary

Jellycat’s ‘Dupe’ Dilemma: Can IP Protect a ‘Cute’ Aesthetic?

September 16, 2026

Commentary

Uncrustables Fame Ruling Sets Up Functionality Fight Over Crimped Edge

September 11, 2026

Commentary

WNBA’s Hope for a ‘The W’ Trademark Rides on a Three-Letter Word

August 31, 2026

Press Release

USPTO Denies Super Lighting Reexamination Request Following PVTECH Pre-Order Submission Under New USPTO Procedure

August 19, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Maintains Strong Presence in Law360 Pulse Pro Bono Leaders Survey

August 18, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • 隐私
  • 免责申明
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP