直 Japanese PDF Font
  • 구성원
  • 업무분야
  • 소식 및 자료
  • 사무소
  • Firm
  • 채용공고
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • 생명과학
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • 업무사례

글로벌 지적재산권 집행, 소송 및 재판

About

When your company is facing an intellectual property-related dispute, either as the IP owner enforcing your rights or as the accused party, the stakes can be staggering—both financially and in the marketplace. A loss may even put an end to your business. You need an informed risk calculation. You need seasoned IP litigators who bring multifaceted and strategic insights in assessing options and how they could impact your business. You need counsel fully prepared and qualified to handle your case from start to finish. At Finnegan, we have more than 200 attorneys well experienced in all forms of U.S. IP litigation, German patent litigation, and European patent litigation in courts, including the Unified Patent Court, before governmental agencies, and in arbitration forums.

At Finnegan, we understand that “victory” comes through many channels and in many forms. It’s all about achieving our clients’ goals. Our understanding of IP law and focus on obtaining favorable results in claim construction hearings, summary judgment proceedings, contested proceedings, arbitrations, and settlement negotiations means we often resolve cases without going to trial and at considerable savings to clients. Simply stated, a successful litigation outcome is one that meets your business goals in the most cost-efficient manner possible.

Full scope litigation services related to European, German, and U.S. laws

Finnegan’s extensive experience drives the insight and tools needed to handle all types of cases—large or small, complex or straightforward, competitor or non-practicing entity. We assess the potential risks and rewards of disputes and provide creative solutions for innovative clients of all sizes, including Fortune 100, startups, and public and private organizations. Our cases have involved issues as complex as human growth hormones, gene therapies, and semiconductor chips. Others have involved more everyday products, like washing machines, trampolines, and makeup brushes.

Even though few IP cases proceed to trial, Finnegan’s attorneys litigate as if we were going to trial from day one. That doesn’t mean indiscriminate discovery and inflated billings. It means putting together the best team and taking a careful and considered look at your case, your goals, the court, the precedents, and the opposition. It means positioning your company for the best outcome at every stage. One of our strengths is extensive insight on experts to use to enhance our clients’ legal positions. Another is experience in trials before juries as well as administrative law judges. IP cases involve distinct substantive and procedural laws, which can be different across venues and jurisdictions. Strategic moves in one case might harm positions in a parallel or appellate proceeding. An experienced, collaborative team that has a comprehensive understanding of IP laws and the associated nuances, as well as dedicated infrastructure and professional staff for supporting IP cases, allows for full focus on the client and learning their products, objectives, working preferences, and vision for success.

Partners in advancing business goals and market value

Protecting and promoting innovation and market trust is a foundational tenet for Finnegan. Through maintaining a culture of service and leadership in professional bar and legal associations, we collaborate with colleagues in industry and government in promoting IP rights and high professional standards. Organizations we are involved with include American College of Trial Lawyers; American Inns of Court; Association of Intellectual Property Experts (VPP); Federal Bar Association (FBA); Federal Circuit Bar Association (FCBA); German Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property & Copyright (GRUR); International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP); and International Trade Commission Trial Lawyers Association (ITC TLA).

Everyone in this practice

Practice Areas

허위광고

As a highly particularized dispute-resolution venue, the advertising industry’s self-regulatory forum, the National Advertising Division, is best navigated by counsel with vast NAD experience.

View 허위광고

독점금지 및 남용

Misuse claims raise many of the same issues as antitrust claims, but, if successful, they can result in unenforceability of patents.

View 독점금지 및 남용

중재 및 기타 분쟁해결 방안

Arbitration and other forms of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) are increasingly used for resolving intellectual property rights disputes and can be particularly effective when parties from different jurisdictions are involved.

View 중재 및 기타 분쟁해결 방안

Branded Hatch-Waxman (ANDA) Litigation and Trials

Success in Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) litigation in the U.S. often begins months or even years before a case is filed. Whether you are anticipating receipt of a Paragraph IV notice letter or still in late-stage clinical trials, it is never too early to start preparation.

View Branded Hatch-Waxman (ANDA) Litigation and Trials

저작권

To maintain a competitive advantage, companies and organizations need clear guidance in German, UK, and US intellectual property law and creative solutions to protect their copyrighted works.

View 저작권

위조상품/Gray Market Goods

Counterfeiting and gray market goods are growing at an alarming rate, resulting in industry losses of billions of dollars annually.

View 위조상품/Gray Market Goods

디자인 특허

Your designs separate you from the competition, make your products distinctive, and help preserve your competitive advantage.

View 디자인 특허

도메인 네임 소송 및 UDRPs

Because of the pervasive nature and extent of cybersquatting and infringement activity on the Internet, you need to manage and set priorities for enforcement efforts by developing specific guidelines and strategies.

View 도메인 네임 소송 및 UDRPs

기업실사

In fast-moving, high-pressure mergers, acquisitions, partnering, and investment transactions, obtaining an accurate and comprehensive intellectual property evaluation is critical.

View 기업실사

항소

Appeals require meticulous attention to the details involved and demand a thorough understanding of appellate law to identify the one or two arguments with the most promise to persuade.

View 항소

ITC 337조 소송 및 재판

Since cases before the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) go to trial faster than cases tried in almost any other forum in the world, they can be the first to be resolved in multi-forum disputes and often spearhead resolution of the other related cases.

View ITC 337조 소송 및 재판

특허 소송 및 재판

To align litigation strategy with business goals might mean settling on reasonable terms as early as possible, or alternatively, sending a message to industry competitors through aggressive enforcement or defensive strategies.

View 특허 소송 및 재판

특허 이의신청

Patent opposition or revocation procedures offer third parties an opportunity to attack a European or German patent within a limited time after grant.

View 특허 이의신청

사전 심리 전략

It begins with frank and honest conversations, listening carefully to better understand your business objectives, your options, your risk tolerance, and your ultimate goals.

View 사전 심리 전략

개인정보처리방침

From data gathering to data storage, from privacy by design to governance and legal compliance, all industries and sectors are faced with complex and often unsettled issues related to privacy.

View 개인정보처리방침

특허 무효심판(PTAB) 소송절차 : 당사자계 무효심판(IPR), 등록 후 무효심판(PGR)

Trial strategy and procedures differ significantly in proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) depending on your position—as a petitioner challenging a patent's validity or as a patent owner defending your rights.

View 특허 무효심판(PTAB) 소송절차 : 당사자계 무효심판(IPR), 등록 후 무효심판(PGR)

Standard Essential Patents (SEPs)

A Standard Essential Patent (SEP) is an invention that is incorporated into the standard for a certain technology. Handling SEP litigation and license negotiations requires a particular type of experience.

View Standard Essential Patents (SEPs)

영업비밀

Intense competition, employee mobility, and the proliferation of spin-off and startup businesses make the trade secret protection critical.

View 영업비밀

상표권 소송 및 재판

When problems arise and valuable trademark rights are at stake or an accusation has been made, it pays to have seasoned litigators and trial lawyers on your side.

View 상표권 소송 및 재판

TTAB 소송

In protecting your brand assets, trademark opposition and cancellation proceedings are effective offensive and defensive strategic tools.

View TTAB 소송

Unitary Patent System (UPS) and the Unified Patent Court (UPC)

The Unified Patent Court opened for business on 1 June 2023, revolutionizing the way in which patents are litigated in Europe.

View Unitary Patent System (UPS) and the Unified Patent Court (UPC)

업무사례

In the Matter of Certain Semiconductor Devices and Products Containing the Same

Achieved a comprehensive victory for respondent Innoscience, a global leader in gallium nitride (GaN) power devices, in a high-profile patent dispute before the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). The ITC’s Final Determination confirms that Innoscience avoided all patent claims asserted by Infineon.

337‑TA‑1414, ITC, Judge Moore

WirelessWerx IP, LLC v. Audi of America, Inc.

Persuaded the court that asserted claims directed to an alleged form of geofencing technology were ineligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101. The court found the patent invalid and dismissed the case against client Audi with prejudice in the first instance.

4:25-cv-11147, E.D. Mich., Judge Behm

Represented a global pharmaceutical company against a generic company on a patent covering an injectable painkilling medicine for short-term pain relief*

Represented a global pharmaceutical company against a generic company on a patent covering an injectable painkilling medicine for short-term pain relief.

Promptu Systems Corporation v. Comcast Corporation

Obtained a $240 million jury verdict for client Promptu in a patent infringement lawsuit against Comcast. The jury found that Comcast willfully infringed Promptu’s patents covering voice recognition technology for TV.

2:16-cv-06516, E.D. Pa., Judge Sanchez
22-1939, Fed. Cir., Judges Prost, Moore, Taranto

Advised a global innovator pharma company in relation to enforcement issues surrounding its second medical use patent for a chemotherapy medication*

Advised a global innovator pharma company in relation to enforcement issues surrounding its second medical use patent for a chemotherapy medication.

Advised a global healthcare company in anticipated court proceedings seeking declarations of non-infringement related to its influenza vaccines*

Advised a global healthcare company in anticipated court proceedings seeking declarations of non-infringement related to its influenza vaccines.

More

Insights

Lecture

Resolving Patent Suits Without Settlement Payments

September 3, 2026

Virtual

Webinar

U.S. Discovery for Foreign Proceedings—28 USC § 1782 Requirements and Practice Tips

September 2, 2026

Webinar

Webinar

PTAB Developments and Their Impact on Parallel Litigation: Strategic Considerations

August 26, 2026

Webinar

Conference

Singapore IP Week 2026

August 26-27, 2026

Conference

Georgia Life Sciences Summit 2026

August 25-26, 2026

Sandy Springs

Webinar

FRAND Rate Setting and Negotiation Conduct: U.S., UK, EU, and China

August 13, 2026

Webinar

More

Upcoming Events

Conference

IPBC Asia 2026

November 17-19, 2026

Tokyo

Conference

IAM Live: Navigating the UPC 2026

November 4, 2026

Paris

Conference

4th Global Patent Litigation FORUM

October 29, 2026

Munich

Conference

2026 EDTX Bench Bar Conference

October 28-30, 2026

Fort Worth

Seminar

Future IP UK

October 21, 2026

London

Hybrid Conference

Intellectual Property Law Institute 2026 – California

October 19-20, 2026

San Francisco

More

뉴스

Award/Ranking

31 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers 2027

August 20, 2026

Award/Ranking

Fourteen Finnegan Attorneys Named to the 2026 IAM Strategy 300 List

August 13, 2026

Commentary

BMW Counsel: How a Supplier Clause Prevented U.S. Trade Secret Litigation

August 3, 2026

Commentary

BMW Uses Forum-Selection Clause to Shut Down ITC Trade Secret Investigation

July 31, 2026

Commentary

A Win in Every Forum: Judge Terminates Zync's Case Against BMW

July 30, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Receives Tier 1 Rankings from Managing IP; More than 30 Attorneys Named 2026 IP Stars

July 30, 2026

More

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • 개인정보처리방침
  • 면책공고
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP