直 Japanese PDF Font
  • 구성원
  • 업무분야
  • 소식 및 자료
  • 사무소
  • Firm
  • 채용공고
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • 생명과학
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • 업무사례

독점금지 및 남용

About

Understanding the IP issues helps minimize risk
Antitrust claims in the United States can lead to significant damages and compulsory licenses. Misuse claims raise many of the same issues as antitrust claims but, if successful, can result in unenforceability of patents, putting at risk the typically large investments made to develop and protect the inventions and income streams from those inventions.

Finnegan’s antitrust attorneys have extensive experience in intellectual property antitrust and misuse issues. They regularly provide guidance to clients to minimize the risks that arise in licensing, litigations, and settlements, and they are prepared to litigate.

The licensing of patents, particularly by industry leaders, routinely raises potential patent antitrust and misuse questions, which both licensors and licensees need to consider to minimize risks. These issues arise in the context of licensing programs for portfolios of patents, individual patents, and pooled patents. They also arise in patent litigations as claims or counterclaims, which can multiply the risks or rewards of the litigation.

Finnegan attorneys have litigated patent antitrust and misuse claims in the context of patent infringement litigations and as separate antitrust cases. In those litigations where some clients have chosen to work with their existing specialists for antitrust issues, Finnegan’s attorneys with expertise in both patent and antitrust law have provided the essential interface between both teams to best represent our clients.

Everyone in this practice

업무사례

CMC Materials, LLC v. Dupont de Nemours, Inc. et al.
Represented DuPont in patent and antitrust litigation in the District of Delaware against a direct competitor relating to chemical-mechanical polishing compositions.

1:20-cv-00738, D. Del., Judge Hall

Haier America Trading, L.L.C. v. Koninklijke Philips N.V. et al.
Defended Philips from antitrust and contract claims relating to digital television broadcasting standards.

1:17-cv-00921, N.D.N.Y., Judges McAvoy, Peebles
18-2992, 2nd Cir.

Hartig Drug Co. Inc. v. Senju Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.
Represented Senju in antitrust cases brought by Hartig related to gatifloxacin, settled on confidential terms.

1:14-cv-00719, D. Del., Judges Batallion, Fallon

Apotex Inc. v. Senju Pharmaceutical
Represented Senju in antitrust cases brought by Apotex related to gatifloxacin, settled on confidential terms.

1:12-cv-00196, D. Del., Judge Robinson

LG Electronics v. Iridian Technologies
Secured favorable settlement of complex iris scanner technology litigation involving infringement, trade secret, contract, antitrust, unfair competition, and Foreign Corrupt Practices Act claims and counterclaims.

2:04-cv-00391, D.N.J., Judges Arleo, Wigenton

Strategic counseling for Applera on antitrust and misuse
Finnegan has represented many healthcare companies in transactions that included strategic counseling on antitrust and patent misuse issues. For example, Finnegan counseled Applera in its strategic settlement with Roche concerning PCR technology.

More

Insights

Federal Circuit IP Blog

$85 million Verdict Affirmed: Federal Circuit Shuts Down Ingevity’s Challenge to Antitrust Verdict

February 27, 2026

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Spotlight on Upcoming Oral Arguments – December 2025

December 1, 2025

Articles

Implications of California's AB 824 Patent Settlement Regulation

May 21, 2025

Virtual Seminar

2025 ACC SFBA Life Sciences Conference

March 4-6, 2025

Virtual

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Later Induced Infringement Claims May Not Be Barred by Earlier Direct Infringement Claims

July 13, 2023

Conference

2022 FCBA Global Series Spring Session

April 26, 2022

Washington, DC

More

뉴스

Award/Ranking

Finnegan’s Munich Office Earns Recognition in 2026 Best Law Firms – Germany Rankings

September 25, 2025

Award/Ranking

10 Finnegan Attorneys Named to the 2023 IAM Strategy 300 List

October 5, 2023

Commentary

Qualcomm’s Victory Dims Prospects of Antitrust Patent Wins

August 11, 2020

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • 개인정보처리방침
  • 면책공고
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP