直 Japanese PDF Font
  • 弁護士等
  • 業務内容
  • 論文等
  • オフィス
  • 事務所概要
  • 採用情報
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • 実績

特許訴訟 ― 仲裁及びその他の裁判外紛争解決

About

コストを抑制しつつ、より有利な解決を図る

弊所は、公判及び控訴に持ち込まれたIP紛争の対応に関して、最も高い評判を得ている法律事務所のひとつですが、状況によっては、裁判外紛争処理(ADR)を選択することもあります。目標達成のために、公判の代わりにADRによる訴訟戦略を構築することも多くあります。

弊所のADRに関する能力は、国内での侵害事件の解決から多国間にまたがる侵害紛争の和解まであらゆるレベルに及んでおり、今後特許問題に対応していく際の判断基準となる契約が締結されるまでになっています。過去10年間にわたり、国際商業会議所、世界知的所有権機関、及び米国仲裁協会における、多くの国内及び国際的なADR手続に関与しています。

弊所には各種のADR手続に関する国内及び国際的な経験があり、その中には、各連邦地方裁判所のパイロットプログラムに基づいた米国裁判官による調停、各ADR組織を通じた中立の専門家による調停、及び両当事者とその両弁護士が同席した直接的な交渉、等が含まれます。我々は、中立の弁護士として活動することもよくあり、各連邦地裁において、特許訴訟の特別審理官及び裁判所が選任したアドバイザーを務めたこともあります。

Everyone in this practice

実績

Genzyme Corp. v. CSRC et al.
Represented CSRC in two arbitrations and one litigation relating to exclusive licenses and patent assignments for patents directed to treating Pompe Disease, a rare genetic disorder that is often fatal if untreated. Secured a $180 million settlement from Genzyme.

01-19-0001-6937; 01-20-0000-5081, AAA

Arbitration victory for major U.S. pharmaceutical company
Represented a major U.S. pharmaceutical company in two arbitrations concerning a leading biologic. Finnegan’s client won both arbitrations and, in the second, was awarded its attorney fees.
Finnegan successfully represents U.S. pharmaceutical company in an arbitration
Represented a U.S. pharmaceutical company in an arbitration with a former consultant and inventor. The dispute involved issues relating to inventorship and ownership, as well as the determination of royalties due under various agreements. The matter settled shortly before the hearing on favorable terms.
AbbVie Biotechnology; Abbott GmbH Ltd. v. InterLab Limited; Merck-Serono Limited
Member of team that represented AbbVie Biotechnology Ltd. and Abbott GmbH in a WIPO arbitration related to patent licensing.

WIPOA120712, WIPO

Cumberland Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Mylan Institutional, LLC
Counsel for Cumberland in ANDA litigation and breach of contract arbitration. Successful outcome in bench trial, arbitration, arbitration fee award, and appeal.

16-1155, -1259, Fed. Cir., Judges Moore, Reyna, Taranto
1:12-cv-03846, N.D. Ill., Judge Pallmeyer

Anoto AB v. LeapFrog Enterprises, Inc.
Guided Anoto through a successful European arbitration proceeding to enforce a supply agreement for a critical component of Anoto’s products, and then spearheaded a successful effort to enforce the arbitrator’s decision in the United States.

3:16-cv-06209, N.D. Cal., Judge Tigar

More

Insights

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Federal Circuit Transfers Case Where an Issue of Federal Patent Law Was Not Necessarily Raised

August 1, 2025

Webinar

Maximizing and Leveraging IP in the Life Sciences

November 10, 2022

Webinar

Articles

Foreign Discovery Tips After Justices Tapered Statute's Scope

November 4, 2022

Lecture

Fundamentals of Dispute Resolution in Japan and United States

December 2, 2021

Webinar

Articles

A Lawsuit Seeking an Injunction Did Not Waive the Right to Arbitration Provided by an Earlier Agreement

October 28, 2021

Articles

A Non-Compete Agreement—Not Including an Arbitration Clause—Superseded an Earlier Signed Dispute Resolution Agreement—Including an Arbitration Clause, So the Court Did Not Compel the Parties To Arbitrate Their Disputes

October 28, 2021

More

最新情報

Media Mention

Sanofi Unit To Pay $180M in Disease Treatment Patent Fight

November 22, 2021

Commentary

Q&A: Arbitrating Trade Secret Disputes

January 2020

James R. Barney

3 Firms Dominate In IP Litigation, GCs Say

September 29, 2014

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • プライバシー
  • 免責事項
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP