A Standard Essential Patent (SEP) is an invention that is incorporated into the standard for a certain technology, meaning that a product which conforms to that standard infringes the patent unless the implementer has a license. SEPs may be mapped on various industries but are particularly common in the telecommunication industries. In these sectors, standardized technologies such as WiFi, 4G/LTE, 5G, NFC, or Bluetooth are required for the connectivity between different products like mobile phones and computers. A single product often comprises several standards and, therefore, numerous SEPs. Companies developing technologies and products involving standards count on Finnegan for sophisticated guidance and representation in this crucial area of IP law.
A comprehensive understanding of all aspects of SEP protection and enforcement informs our work with clients in developing robust SEP portfolios, negotiating licensing agreements that maximize revenue while maintaining fair access to the technologies, and resolving disputes in high-stakes SEP litigation. Our professionals have advanced technical degrees in all major SEP-related technology fields—from computers to telecommunications to the automotive sector—as well as decades of experience participating in standards settings organizations and handling complex IP matters across multiple venues.
Our attorneys work closely with clients to build global SEP portfolios, executing on plans tailored to their goals and budget. We help procure patents that cover standard essential technologies and are resilient to post-grant challenges; develop effective national and global filing strategies; and ensure compliance with policies of the corresponding standards setting organization. Drawing on deep technical expertise and legal acumen, we focus on securing high value patents that provide the best possible protection to our clients’ inventions.
Developing a profitable SEP portfolio often involves assessing patents and applications declared essential and providing opinions on essentiality and invalidity. Finnegan professionals are particularly well versed in evaluating patents involving telecommunication and video compression standards, such as 4G, 5G, 802.11, Bluetooth, H.264/MPEG-4 AVC, and H.265/HEVC.
Handling SEP litigation and license negotiations requires a particular type of experience. SEPs not only involve multiple jurisdictions and different technologies, but they are also subject to special licensing rules that often implicate antitrust law. SEP litigation also raises numerous issues regarding damages and injunctions that do not occur in other types of patent litigation. Finnegan delivers full-scope services related to SEPs for both innovators and implementers in key jurisdictions like the US, UK, and Europe, including the Unified Patent Court (UPC), and can provide a truly global approach tailored to your individual needs and product strategy.
If a patent is truly essential to a standard, it can create tremendous business value, because if no licensing agreement has been concluded, practicing the standard, by definition, will infringe a true SEP. In this regard, multinational licensing experience in SEPs is just as important as litigation experience for multijurisdictional patent disputes all around the world. Finnegan’s licensing experts assist both patent owners and implementers in navigating the complexities of SEP license negotiations. Our patent litigators enforce SEPs against infringers or defend against SEP assertions, regardless of the size of the litigation or however many jurisdictions it may encompass.
Representing a multinational technology company in developing its artificial intelligence (AI) and neural processing units (NPUs) portfolio, including preparing new patent applications and prosecuting before the patent office.
2:21-CV-00389, E.D. Tex., Judge Gilstrap
2:21-cv-00318, E.D. Tex., Judge Gilstrap
6:21-cv-00270, W.D. Tex., Judge Albright
Filed an amicus brief on behalf of non-parties Toyota Motor Corporation, Honda Motor Company, Nissan Motor Company, DENSO Corporation, and Hyundai Motor Company in a Federal Circuit appeal involving issues related to standard-essential patents.
18-1363, -1380, -1382, -1732, Fed. Cir., Judges Newman, Chen, Hughes
Represented licensees and licensors in patent and trade secret license negotiations involving standard-essential patents (SEPs), semiconductor or integrated circuit (IC) patents, semiconductor process patents, factory management and automation patents, fitness equipment patents, telecommunication patents, computer networking patents, and other technologies in dozens of license negotiations; represented global companies in various IP license and cross license negotiations, presented and countered infringement assertions, formulated license terms and business arrangements, and prepared license agreements involving SEP patents, non-SEP patents, FRAND issues, MFN issues, audit provisions, arbitration mechanisms, etc.
Articles
Unpacking Dolby v. Roku: The First HEVC SEP-Based European Preliminary Injunction
April 16, 2026
Award/Ranking
IAM Recognizes Six Finnegan Partners in its 2026 Global Leaders Guide
October 22, 2025
Award/Ranking
Seven Finnegan Attorneys Recognized in the 2025 IAM Global Leaders Guide
October 23, 2024
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.